2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RepMatch: Robust Feature Matching and Pose for Reconstructing Modern Cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, some urban scenes with repetitive structures still cause alignment issues [36], which may limit the application of our method. Therefore, we use a more robust feature matching method RepMatch [37], and a more robust RANSAC solution USAC [38] for estimating a global homography, to generalize our proposed method in urban scenes. Non-planar scenes may cause outlier removal issues [17], but fortunately, [39] justifies that a simple RANSAC-driven homography still works reasonably well even for such cases.…”
Section: A Results Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, some urban scenes with repetitive structures still cause alignment issues [36], which may limit the application of our method. Therefore, we use a more robust feature matching method RepMatch [37], and a more robust RANSAC solution USAC [38] for estimating a global homography, to generalize our proposed method in urban scenes. Non-planar scenes may cause outlier removal issues [17], but fortunately, [39] justifies that a simple RANSAC-driven homography still works reasonably well even for such cases.…”
Section: A Results Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correct matches tend to form clusters with specific motions, and previous works proposed explicit geometrical checks for guaranteeing a consistent transformation of the inlier point set [20,27,61], based on local planarity or local contour invariance. More recently, datadriven strategies for selecting consistent observations have been proposed; for example, in [71] the authors rely on a one-class SVM to select a reliable candidate inlier set, and in [28] a motion model based on bilateral functions is used. However, all these approaches which rely on higher-level perceptual information in order to validate the inlier set coherent motion are not effective in complex urban environments with scarce candidates, abrupt and frequent depth variations of the scene and inconsistent edge detections due to significant viewpoint changes (see, for example, Fig.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the existing feature tracking methods, such as ROML [58], MODS [59] and RepMatch [60], have already obtained excellent performance on the small or middle scale surroundings, their performance including both matching speed and matching precision still needs to improve in large scale scenes with repeated structures. For example, Zhou et al [61] hold that the ability of the existing feature tracking approaches is still essentially limited by the abrupt scale changes in images.…”
Section: A Feature Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%