2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report from the STRAND Working Group on the 2019 STR sequence nomenclature meeting

Abstract: This report summarizes topics discussed at the STR sequence nomenclature meeting hosted by the STRAND Working Group in April 2019. Invited attendees for this meeting included researchers known-to-us to be developing STR sequence-based nomenclature schemata, scientific representatives from vendors developing STR sequence bioinformatic methods, DNA intelligence database curators, and academic experts in STR genomics. The goal of this meeting was to provide a forum for individuals developing nomenclature schemata… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A unified minimal nomenclature of the complex sequences obtained by MPS technologies was recommended by the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) in 2016 21,22 to facilitate communication between laboratories and to make this data backward compatible with LB data produced on CE platform. In early 2019, the STRAND Working Group was formalized to discuss the expanding and advancing topics of STR sequence nomenclature 23 . Quality control of string sequences and alleles has also been suggested by ISFG 24 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A unified minimal nomenclature of the complex sequences obtained by MPS technologies was recommended by the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) in 2016 21,22 to facilitate communication between laboratories and to make this data backward compatible with LB data produced on CE platform. In early 2019, the STRAND Working Group was formalized to discuss the expanding and advancing topics of STR sequence nomenclature 23 . Quality control of string sequences and alleles has also been suggested by ISFG 24 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty of retrieving MPS allele sequence data including sufficient FR information without advanced bioinformatics knowledge has in some cases hampered QC. FR output between unambiguous coordinates has been postulated [ 39 ]. STR sequence nomenclature was not assessed during QC; the highly desired forensic recommendation is currently under development [ 29 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ].…”
Section: Results Of Strider Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FR output between unambiguous coordinates has been postulated [ 39 ]. STR sequence nomenclature was not assessed during QC; the highly desired forensic recommendation is currently under development [ 29 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. Further errors detected in CE-translated allele tables were similar to those described in the previous chapter, but not taken into account for a decision on the MPS datasets.…”
Section: Results Of Strider Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw FASTQ data files were analyzed using MixtureAce™ (NicheVision Forensics, Akron, OH) with an analytical threshold of zero. Read sequences were bioinformatically trimmed to match the Verogen recommended analyzable regions [29] and exported to comma separated value (CSV) files along with their read count intensities (RCI). Stutter artifacts identified by MixtureAce were deleted from the CSV files.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%