1997
DOI: 10.1017/s1041610297004675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report of an International Psychogeriatric Association Special Meeting Work Group; Under the Cosponsorship of Alzheimer's Disease International, the European Federation of Neurological Societies, the World Health Organization, and the World Psychiatric Association

Abstract: Current knowledge with respect to the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is reviewed. There is agreement that AD is a characteristic clinicopathologic entity that is amenable to diagnosis. The diagnosis of AD should no longer be considered one of exclusion. Rather, the diagnostic process is one of recognition of the characteristic features of AD and of conditions that can have an impact on presentation or mimic aspects of the clinicopathologic picture. The present availability of improved prognosis, managem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, the finding that AD patients had comparatively normal scores on the FBI (a tool designed to tap into emotional dysregulation related to frontal lobe atrophy) is not surprising, considering the relative sparing of frontal lobes in AD [32] . Some have found emotional symptoms to be unrelated to the neuropathological burden of AD [63,64] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the finding that AD patients had comparatively normal scores on the FBI (a tool designed to tap into emotional dysregulation related to frontal lobe atrophy) is not surprising, considering the relative sparing of frontal lobes in AD [32] . Some have found emotional symptoms to be unrelated to the neuropathological burden of AD [63,64] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, only specialised clinical expert centres achieve a correct diagnosis of probable and possible AD with an accuracy of more than 80 % on the basis of the medical history, a neuropsychological examination, cognitive symptoms, imaging techniques and, concerning other forms of *Address correspondence to this author at Business Development, BioVisioN AG, Feodor-Lynen-Str. 5, D-30625 Hannover, Germany; Tel: +49 (511) 538896-37; Fax: +49 (511) 538896-66; E-mail: h.selle@peptidomics.de 1 Differential Peptide Display, Peptidomics and Spectromania are trademarks of BioVisioN AG dementia, exclusionary parameters [2]. However, at such an advanced state of the disease the neurodegenerative process has already caused a substantial loss of brain tissue, yet a definite diagnosis can be done only post mortem b y histological examination of brain tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the measurement of tau protein and Aβ in combination and the determination of phosphorylated tau protein is quite useful in distinguishing AD from healthy controls and from other neurodegenerative disorders [6,7], respectively, there is still a substantial need for further improvement of AD diagnosis [2,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American College of Radiology recommends functional imaging for cases that are difficult to diagnose [77]. More recent consensus statements concur that imaging techniques have an important role to play in the diagnosis and assessment of dementia and specifically AD [78][79][80][81][82]. In the UK, both English and Scottish guidelines recommend imaging, in particular SPECT, for the differential diagnosis of difficult cases [83,84].…”
Section: Guidelines and Consensus Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%