2016
DOI: 10.6028/nist.ir.8152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Report on the May 2016 ASTM E57.02 Instrument Runoff at NIST, Part 1 � Background Information and Key Findings

Abstract: Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n'arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the geometric description, the properties color, material, surface finish, and reflectivity are used to describe the target designs in previous literature [25,44,45]. They are briefly explained in the following: Geometry: In the geometric form of targets, a differentiation is made between plane and spatial targets.…”
Section: Preliminary Considerations Of Target Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the geometric description, the properties color, material, surface finish, and reflectivity are used to describe the target designs in previous literature [25,44,45]. They are briefly explained in the following: Geometry: In the geometric form of targets, a differentiation is made between plane and spatial targets.…”
Section: Preliminary Considerations Of Target Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases of the indoor TLS calibration, the limiting factor is the ceiling height, and this should be the main guideline when selecting an appropriate facility. In order to increase the sensitivity in a room with limited dimensions, two modifications can be applied-short tripods, allowing the instrument placement only several centimeters above the ground, and mirrors placed on the ceiling, artificially extending the steep lines-of-sight, as already suggested in [41].…”
Section: Discussion Of Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 depicts the latter misalignments excluding the commonly known vertical index offset and rangefinder offset. The parameter nomenclature is adopted from the American National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), who originally derived the parametrization and proved it as valid in the run-off experiment, where several leading manufacturers were involved [41]. The readers are referred to Muralikrishnan et al 2015 [22] for more details.…”
Section: Calibration Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The techniques proposed in this section were developed after analyzing thousands of sphere datasets acquired from six different TLSs. This data was acquired during an instrument runoff [8] performed as part of the ongoing ASTM E57 standards work. The methods we propose here were tested on those datasets to ensure their broad applicability across different TLSs.…”
Section: Methods To Segment Sphere From 3d Scan Data and Obtain Thementioning
confidence: 99%