1996
DOI: 10.1016/0300-9572(95)00928-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting approval by research ethics committees and subjects' consent in human resuscitation research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been found that 24% to 84% of articles published in various scientific journals do not mention about ECA, while 22% to 75% of published studies do not inform readers about written informed consent being taken [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Table 4. The journal, the year of publication, and the type of study design influence the proportion of published studies mentioning about these ethical aspects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It has been found that 24% to 84% of articles published in various scientific journals do not mention about ECA, while 22% to 75% of published studies do not inform readers about written informed consent being taken [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Table 4. The journal, the year of publication, and the type of study design influence the proportion of published studies mentioning about these ethical aspects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally it has been observed that over the years, there has been an increase in the proportion of studies reporting on these details. [5,10] Most of these studies have included randomized controlled trials [6,10,12] or prospective study designs for analysis. [5] Our study unearthed a relatively less reported fact: the proportion of articles with retrospective study design reporting about ECA was abysmally low (just over 8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, empirical data from several studies throughout the last two decades suggest insufficient reporting of ethics review approvals and IC procedures in peer-reviewed articles and metaanalysis [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Weil and colleagues demonstrated that only 52% of the articles in paediatric journals reported ethical approval and one in seven studies had not undergone REC review [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%