2015
DOI: 10.1108/s1475-148820150000018004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting Fraud: An Examination of the Bystander Effect and Evidence Strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The individuals do not want to help other who are in an emergency (Latané and Darley, 1970). Individuals are late in reacting and only to observe the events (Brink and Gan, 2015). In accounting fraud, individuals who know that fraud has occurred tend to ignore, choose to silent, or do not want to be involved in the case (Sarwono and Meinarno, 2009).…”
Section: Bystander Effect and Accounting Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The individuals do not want to help other who are in an emergency (Latané and Darley, 1970). Individuals are late in reacting and only to observe the events (Brink and Gan, 2015). In accounting fraud, individuals who know that fraud has occurred tend to ignore, choose to silent, or do not want to be involved in the case (Sarwono and Meinarno, 2009).…”
Section: Bystander Effect and Accounting Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managers tend not to report these incidents because they interfere with work, even endanger their position or position in the workplace. Most previous studies stated that the bystander effect reduces an individual's intention to disclose fraud (whistleblowing) (Brink and Gan, 2015;Asiah, 2017). The higher the bystander effect phenomenon, the higher the potential for fraud in the organization.…”
Section: Bystander Effect and Accounting Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the bystander effect, the higher the tendency for accounting fraud [7], [8], [8], [9] Other studies have shown that, when there is strong evidence suggesting the existence of fraudulent acts, individuals with their own knowledge are more likely to report than when others are aware of fraudulent acts (bystander effect). However, the bystander effect was not found when the evidence of fraud was weak [1]. On the other hand, the results of research by [9], [10], show that the bystander effect does not have a significant effect on the tendency of accounting fraud.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Fraud is a social and economic problem that poses a very serious and expensive threat to businesses around the world [1], because it can involve various stakeholders in the company, from top managers, shareholders, employees, suppliers, to auditors [2]. Thus, the role of audit and internal control is needed in the prevention and detection of fraud [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the bystander effect, the higher the tendency for accounting fraud (Noviyanti et al, 2021) (Redini & Indraswarawati, 2021) (Asiah & Setyorini, 2017). However, the bystander effect was not found when the evidence of fraud was weak (Brink et al, 2015). The bystander effect has no significant effect on the tendency of accounting fraud (Asia & Setyorini, 2017) (Masdiantini et al, 2021).…”
Section: Empirical Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%