2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02468-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reporting of acute pancreatitis by radiologists-time for a systematic change with structured reporting template

Abstract: Acute pancreatitis has a wide array of imaging presentations. Various classifications have been used in the past to standardize the terminology and reduce confusing and redundant terms. We aim to review the historical and current classifications of acute pancreatitis and propose a new reporting template which can improve communication between various medical teams by use of appropriate terminology and structured radiology template. The standardized reporting template not only conveys the most important imaging… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IEP is more common, accounting for about 85% of fluid collections in patients with acute pancreatitis 15. Complications associated with IEP include acute peripancreatic fluid collections or chronic pancreatic pseudocyst.…”
Section: Presentation and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IEP is more common, accounting for about 85% of fluid collections in patients with acute pancreatitis 15. Complications associated with IEP include acute peripancreatic fluid collections or chronic pancreatic pseudocyst.…”
Section: Presentation and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the distribution and location of necrosis, NP can be further subdivided into three subtypes ( 46 ): (1) combined pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis (about 75.0%); (2) peripancreatic necrosis only (about 20.0%); and (3) pancreatic necrosis only (about 5.0%). The literature indicates that compared with NP, the mortality rate of IEP is about 3.0% while the mortality rate of NP is about 17%; and if combined with infection, the mortality rate of NP can rise to about 30% ( 46 , 51 ). Consequently, it is of great clinical significance to distinguish IEP from NP for predicting the prognosis of AP patients.…”
Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it is of great clinical significance to distinguish IEP from NP for predicting the prognosis of AP patients. In the international structured reporting template of AP based on CECT published in 2020, experts also highlighted the importance of radiologists to clarify the morphologic subtypes of AP, the degree and anatomic area involvement of NP, the type and location of peripancreatic collections, and some other key points in the CT reports ( 51 ).…”
Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It detects early complications like inflamed peripancreatic planes with retroperitoneal fluid collections during the patient's initial hospital stay. Long-term follow-up imaging of these patients on an outpatient basis might be required to exclude late complications of SAP, including disconnected duct syndrome and pancreatico-cutaneous fistula formation 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%