Reports of Wins and Risk Taking: An Investigation of the Mediating Effect of the Illusion of Control

Abstract

Two experiments examined the relationships between the knowledge that another person has won in a gamble, the illusion of control and risk taking. Participants played a computer-simulated French roulette game individually. Before playing, some participants learnt that another person won a large amount of money. Results from a first experiment (n = 24) validated a causal model where the knowledge of another person's win increased the illusion of control, measured with betting times, expectancy and self-reports on scales, which in turn encourages risk taking. In the second experiment (n = 36), some participants were told the previous player acknowledged the win to be fortuitous. The suppression of the belief that the previous winner had himself exerted control over the outcome resulted in lower rates of risk-taking behaviors. This suggests that it was not the knowledge of another person's win in itself that increased risk taking, but rather, the belief that the other person had some control over the gamble's outcome. Theoretical implications for the study of social mechanisms involved in gambling behavior are discussed.

Gamifying Accelerometer Use Increases Physical Activity Levels of Sedentary Office Workers

“…However, if the participant did not meet the goal, the participant had that same amount deducted from his or her daily steps (−500 steps). This game feature was implemented based on risk‐taking theory, which suggests that people are more likely to engage in a challenge if they believe they have a realistic chance of receiving a payoff 26, 27. The individual could also choose not to accept the challenge.…”

Promoting responsible gambling via prevention messages: insights from the evaluation of actual European messages

“…Correcting erroneous beliefs is in fact already used in cognitive therapy as a strategy to treat problem gambling (Ladouceur & Walker, 1996). Multiple studies have also shown that correcting erroneous beliefs by prevention messages is relevant to prevent problem gambling (Benhsain, Taillefer, & Ladouceur, 2004;Cloutier, Ladouceur & Sévigny, 2006;Floyd, Whelan, & Meyers, 2006;Jardin & Wulfert, 2009;Martinez, Le Floch, Gaffié, & Villejoubert, 2011;Steenbergh et al, 2004). For example, messages reminding the predominance of chance on the outcome of the game in a session of gambling limit risk-taking of the gamblers (Martinez et al, 2011).…”

The Influence of Locus of Control and Sensation Seeking Among Undergraduate Texas Hold’em Players

“…In contrast to slot machines, lotteries, and bingo, which can be viewed as games of pure chance such that any perception of skill is an unrealistic expectance of personal success (Cabot, Light, & Rutledge, 2009) or an illusion of control (Dykstra & Dollinger, 1990;Langer, 1975;Martinez, Le Floch, Gaffié, & Villejoubert, 2011), Hold'em is often conceptualized and viewed as a sport or even career, in which players can control the outcome through motivation, strategy, and skill (McMullan & Kervin, 2011). Undergraduate students tend to spend more money on games in which skill is perceived as an important factor in comparison to those games perceived to be more dependent on chance (Kairouz, Paradis, & Monson, 2015).…”