“…Variations in the attitudes of principals shape the rates of exclusionary discipline, and the evidence suggests that principals who consider the context and have a clear philosophy that guides discipline use exclusionary discipline less often relative to principals who strictly adhere to disciplinary policy (Mukuria, 2002). Teachers’ classroom management skills (Skiba, Chung, et al, 2014), teacher–student racial match (Bradshaw, Mitchell, O’Brennan, et al, 2010; Jordan & Anil, 2009; Kinsler, 2011; Lindsay & Hart, 2017), the lack of a representative bureaucracy (Blake, Smith, Marchbanks, Seibert, & Kim, 2016; Feistritzer, Griffin, & Linnajarvi, 2011; Grissom, Nicholson-Crotty, & Nicholson-Crotty, 2009; Meier, 1993; Meier & Stewart, 1992; Roch, Pitts, & Navarro, 2010; Rocha & Hawes, 2009; Staats, 2014), and teachers’ perceptions, expectations, and bias (Bradshaw, Mitchell, O’Brennan, et al, 2010; Carter et al, 2017; Gershenson & Dee, 2017; Golann, 2015; Gregory & Mosely, 2004; Gullo, 2017; Hines-Datiri, 2015; McNeal, 2016; Okonofua, Walton, & Eberhardt, 2016; Skiba et al, 2011; Staats, 2014) also play a critical role in the disciplinary process.…”