2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representing the consequences of our actions trial by trial: Complex and flexible encoding of feedback valence and magnitude

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inconsistent interpretations of the feedback P3 preclude confident conclusions. Whereas Euser et al () associated both FRN and feedback P3 with outcome evaluation and found both components to be altered in AUD, Padrón and colleagues distinguished FRN as sensitive to outcome valence from feedback P3 as affected by outcome magnitude: “FRN and the feedback P300 in fact reflect different performance monitoring processes in a flexible way that depends on the behavioral context” (Padrón, Fernández‐Rey, Acuña, & Pardo‐Vazquez, , p. 264). Smaller FRN in present AUD may have reflected less sensitivity to “primary or salient stimulus attributes (often gain vs. loss) …” (Bernat, Nelson, & Baskin‐Sommers, , p. 1), whereas outcome magnitude in the present task was less relevant, explaining the similar feedback P3 in AUD and HC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inconsistent interpretations of the feedback P3 preclude confident conclusions. Whereas Euser et al () associated both FRN and feedback P3 with outcome evaluation and found both components to be altered in AUD, Padrón and colleagues distinguished FRN as sensitive to outcome valence from feedback P3 as affected by outcome magnitude: “FRN and the feedback P300 in fact reflect different performance monitoring processes in a flexible way that depends on the behavioral context” (Padrón, Fernández‐Rey, Acuña, & Pardo‐Vazquez, , p. 264). Smaller FRN in present AUD may have reflected less sensitivity to “primary or salient stimulus attributes (often gain vs. loss) …” (Bernat, Nelson, & Baskin‐Sommers, , p. 1), whereas outcome magnitude in the present task was less relevant, explaining the similar feedback P3 in AUD and HC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the “draw” condition, our PCE cohort showed smaller P300 amplitudes, which in the context of the game presented can be seen as a failure to win money one could have won. The P300 during decision-making and outcome feedback may be associated with evaluation of probability and estimation of future chances based upon working memory and past experiences (Padron, Fernandez-Rey, Acuna, & Pardo-Vazquez, 2016; Wang et al, 2015). Indeed, smaller P300 amplitudes have been associated with increased cognitive rigidity and poorer performance in tasks of executive function (Dong, Du, & Qi, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, few studies have investigated the relationship between feedback-related ERPs and task difficulty. Several studies have reported that no effect of the task difficulty was shown on the FRN [79][80][81]. Another study has reported the opposite evidence [82].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another study has reported the opposite evidence [ 82 ]. In contrast, P300 was found to be sensitive to task difficulty [ 80 , 81 ]. Research on feedback-related ERPs and task difficulty is still insufficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation