2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05436.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of a four-point clinical severity score for glabellar frown lines

Abstract: The clinical 0-3 score for glabellar frown lines shows a good inter- and intraobserver reproducibility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the 2 versions are highly correlated (r = 0.82-0.94) and have an identical point range, we used them as one scale (BDI) [21]. All studies used the same Clinical Severity Score for Glabellar Frown Lines (CSS-GFL) to assess frown scores at baseline and week 6 [22]. One of the trials involved a cross-over of the BTA and the placebo group after 12 weeks.…”
Section: Inclusion Criteria Scales and Data Poolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 2 versions are highly correlated (r = 0.82-0.94) and have an identical point range, we used them as one scale (BDI) [21]. All studies used the same Clinical Severity Score for Glabellar Frown Lines (CSS-GFL) to assess frown scores at baseline and week 6 [22]. One of the trials involved a cross-over of the BTA and the placebo group after 12 weeks.…”
Section: Inclusion Criteria Scales and Data Poolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main efficacy assessments were based on a 4-point standardized clinical scale (0, no wrinkles; 1, mild wrinkles; 2, moderate wrinkles; and 3, severe wrinkles) that has been shown to have good to excellent reproducibility. 11 Unlike other studies [1][2][3] that have used 2 separate scales, only 1 scale was used to grade the wrinkles at maximum frown and at rest in this study.…”
Section: Assessments and Clinical Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in aesthetic medicine, differences can sometimes be subtle which can make clinically significant changes difficult to quantify. Clinicians and researchers alike have therefore sought objective ways to categorize changes in human skin [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Profilometry with facial molding, and semiobjective visual assessment scales [i.e., the Fitzpatrick perioral and periorbital wrinkle scoring system and the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS)] have emerged as useful tool to assess wrinkles and changes in wrinkle severity [1,2,4,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%