Reproducibility of bracket positioning in the indirect bonding technique

Nichols, Dale A.; Gardner, Gary; Carballeyra, Alain D.

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.023

Cited by 33 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the indirect bonding technique was recommended in the 1970s (Silverman et al, 1972), the topic has sometimes been discussed again in the world literature (Bozelli et al, 2013;Castilla et al, 2014;Ciuffolo et al, 2012;Deahl et al, 2007;Gange, 2000;Gayake et al, 2013;Hodge et al, 2014;Kanashiro et al, 2014;Koo et al, 1999;Miles, 2010;Mohode, 2012; Nichols et al, 2013). At present, it is routinely used in the lingual technique, and eventually in the technique for brackets bonded from the vestibular side, when the professional has the intention to hasten the clinical act of positioning the brackets, thereby reducing chair-time, with this factor being an aspect on which there is unanimity in the studies (Bozelli et al, 2013;Castilla et al, 2014;Ciuffolo et al, 2012).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Author(s) agree that this article remain permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License difficult access in the mouth, such as the region of posterior teeth out of the correct position in the arch, the tiredness and stress of both the orthodontist and patient, leading to incorrect bracket bonding in patients, and unsuccessful final positioning of the teeth (Ciuffolo, Tenisci and Pollutri, 2012;Nichols;Gardner and Carballeyra, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Periodontal conditions in orthodontic patients using direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques: A randomized study

Zanini¹,

Nassar²,

Nassar³

et al. 2016

J. Dent. Oral Hyg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was comparing two orthodontic bracket bonding techniques (direct and indirect), with regard to the following variables: plaque index; gingival index, evaluation of gingival crevicular fluid, and white spots on tooth enamel. Seventeen patients were randomly selected (10 men and 7 women) with a mean age of 15.8 years, and these were subjected to comprehensive orthodontic treatment (braces), totaling a sample size of 260 teeth examined. The experimental model used was the split-mouth technique, in each patient, the maxillary brackets in one hemi-arch were bonded by the direct, and in the other by the indirect technique, the same occurring in the mandibular arch. Assessments were performed in the following time intervals: pre-bonding, one, three and six months after initial placement of the brackets. The data were subjected to statistical analysis by the KruskalWallys test (Dunn's post-test) to assess the intra-group evolution of the variables. The Wilcoxon test was used for comparison between groups. The brackets bonded to teeth by the direct technique showed a higher number of surfaces with the presence of bacterial plaque and bleeding, when compared with the indirect technique, in time intervals of 3 and 6 months. For measurement of fluid, direct bonding showed increased index in 3-month evaluation. The occurrence of white spots showed no statistical difference between groups. As conclusion, indirect technique shows less oral health impairment with a lower incidence of plaque accumulation, bleeding and fluid.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Periodontal conditions in orthodontic patients using direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques: A randomized study

Zanini¹,

Nassar²,

Nassar³

et al. 2016

J. Dent. Oral Hyg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[1][2][3][4] Ortodontik tedavinin başarısını etkileyen en önemli faktör, braketlerin doğru pozisyonlandırılmasıdır. Böylece tedavi ortasında ve/veya sonunda gereken büküm ihtiyacı ya da braketlerin yeniden konumlandırılması ihtiyacı ortadan kalkarak tedavi süresinin gereksiz uzamasının önüne geçilecektir.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…İndirekt braket konumlandırma işlemi, en uygun braket pozisyonlandırma sağladığı için altın standart olarak kabul edilmektedir. 1,2,8,9 Resim 2. Model üzerine braketlerin LED ışık ile sabitlenmesi.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

The Evaluation Of Clinical Chair Time And Bracket Failure Rates Between Direct And Indirect Bonding Methods

Di̇ndaroğlu¹,

Dogan²,

Doğan³

2016

EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖZETAmaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; direkt ve indirekt yöntem ile yapılan braket yapıştırma işleminde, klinikte geçen çalışma zamanı ve birinci ayda gözlenen braket kopma miktarlarını karşılaştırmaktır. Yöntem: Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı'na ortodontik tedavi amacıyla başvuran hafif ya da orta şiddette çapraşıklığı olan Angle sınıf I maloklüzyonuna sahip toplam 40 birey çalışmaya dâhil edilmiştir. Hastalar rastgele iki gruba ayrılarak 20 kişinin üst çenesine indirekt yapıştırma yöntemi uygulanırken, alt çenesine direkt yöntemle yapıştırma yapılmıştır. Diğer 20 hastada ise, üst çenede direkt, alt çenede ise indirekt yöntem kullanılmıştır. Uygulama esnasında her iki yöntemde de hasta başında geçen süre ve ilk ayda braketlerde görülen kopma miktarları tespit edilmiştir. Verilerin istatistiksel değerlendirilmesinde bağımsız iki örnek t testi kullanılmıştır. İstatistiksel önem sınırı p<0.05 olarak alınmıştır. Bulgular: İndirekt yöntem ile klinikte hasta başında geçen ortalama süre 13,2 ± 4,1 dakika iken, direkt yöntemde bu süre ortalama 27,3 ± 7,2 dakika olarak bulunmuştur. Yöntemler arasında bulunan fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlıdır (p<0.05). Yapıştırmadan sonraki birinci ayda indirekt yöntemde gözlenen ortalama braket kopma miktarı 0,98 ± 0,67 iken, direkt yöntemde birinci ayda gözlenen braket kopma miktarı ise 1,01 ± 0,76'dır. Sonuç: İndirekt yapıştırma yöntemi hasta başında geçen süreyi yaklaşık iki kat azaltmaktadır. Bir aylık gözlem süresince braket kopma miktarı açısından direkt yöntem ile indirekt yöntem arasında farklık yoktur. Anahtar Kelimeler: direkt yapıştırma, indirekt yapıştırma, klinik çalışma zamanı, braket kopma miktarı

show abstract

“…This inaccuracy results in a lack of root parallelism, of mutually protected guidances and also in inadequate intercuspation [3,5]. Therefore, when brackets are not properly positioned, arises the need to place compensatory bends on the archwires [6] or rebond brackets, which results in increased treatment time [7,8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Are the posterior bracket placement patterns reliable?

Mattielo¹,

Arruda²,

Xavier³

et al. 2016

Rev. Odonto Ciênc. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Investigate the marginal ridges leveling accuracy of Alexander and Viazis bracket placement methods. Methods: Eighty pairs of dental casts were selected, with complete permanent dentition, without occlusal wear or restorations. A linking line between mesial and distal ridges of posterior teeth was done to measure the occlusal thirds with digital caliper. The means, obtained from 3 different examiners, were compared with the values of Alexander and Viazis' equations through One-way ANOVA with α=0.05. Results: The second premolar placement value (x) suggested by the authors showed no difference in comparison to the occlusal third size of the sample teeth (p>0.05), however for the first premolars, a significant difference was found (p<0.001). The value adopted for positioning on the first permanent molars (x-0.5mm) is consistent with the size of the occlusal third of these teeth (p=0.0531). A significant difference was also found for the second permanent molars bracket positioning between the predefined value (x-1mm) and the sample (p<0.001). Conclusions: The vertical positioning values proposed by Alexander and Viazis for placement of second premolars and first permanent molars do contribute to the leveling of marginal ridges, which cannot be applied for the values recommended for the first premolars and second permanent molars.Key words: Dental bonding; Orthodontic appliances; Orthodontic brackets Os padrões de posicionamento posterior de bráquetes são confiáveis?ResuMO Objetivo: Verificar a precisão no nivelamento de cristas marginais dos padrões de posicionamento de bráquetes de Alexander e Viazis em dentes posteriores. Métodos: Foram selecionados 80 pares de modelos de gesso com dentição permanente completa e sem desgastes ou restaurações oclusais. Uma linha ligando as cristas marginais mesial e distal dos dentes foi demarcada, visando a medição do terço oclusal com um paquímetro digital milimetrado. As médias obtidas de 3 examinadores foram comparadas com os valores propostos por Alexander e Viazis através do teste de One-Way ANOVA com α=0,05. Resultados: O valor (x) proposto para o posicionamento nos segundos pré-molares não apresentou diferença com a dimensão do terço oclusal da amostra (p>0,05); entretanto para os primeiros pré-molares houve diferença significativa (p<0,001). O valor de posicionamento adotado para os primeiros molares permanentes (x-0,5mm) foi condizente com a dimensão do terço oclusal destes dentes (p=0,0531). Houve diferença significativa entre o valor (x-1mm) predifinido para os segundos molares permanentes e a amostra (p<0,001). Conclusões: Os valores de posicionamento de acessórios propostos por Alexander e Viazis para os segundos pré-molares e para os primeiros molares permanentes promovem o nivelamento das cristas marginais, entretanto o mesmo não ocorre para os primeiros pré-molares e segundos molares permanentes.

show abstract

Reproducibility of bracket positioning in the indirect bonding technique

Cited by 33 publications

References 9 publications

Periodontal conditions in orthodontic patients using direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques: A randomized study

Periodontal conditions in orthodontic patients using direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques: A randomized study

The Evaluation Of Clinical Chair Time And Bracket Failure Rates Between Direct And Indirect Bonding Methods

Are the posterior bracket placement patterns reliable?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About