2010
DOI: 10.1177/1352458510371640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of high-resolution optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis

Abstract: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive method to quantify neurodegeneration as an outcome in multiple sclerosis clinical trials; however, no data exist on Cirrus spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) reproducibility in patients with multiple sclerosis. The objective of this study was to determine the protocol for achieving optimal inter-visit, inter-rater, and intra-rater reproducibility for studies performed on healthy controls and multiple sclerosis patients utilizing novel high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25,26 Utilizing the Heidelberg Spectralis ® HRA + OCT, we were able to demonstrate significant RNFL thinning in multiple sclerosis patients compared with controls. As well as in eyes with optic neuritis compared with those without optic neuritis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…25,26 Utilizing the Heidelberg Spectralis ® HRA + OCT, we were able to demonstrate significant RNFL thinning in multiple sclerosis patients compared with controls. As well as in eyes with optic neuritis compared with those without optic neuritis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Many of current generation SD-OCT device typically report an excellent ICC (i.e., greater than 90%) and coefficient of variation below 4.0% for the global average and quadrant circumpapillary RNFL. [7][8][9][10][11][12] It is important to note that ICC values are population specific, so their values are not comparable between studies. Despite our lack of eye tracking and registration software, the CV results from our study are comparable to SD-OCT studies that enrolled adult healthy controls and those with glaucoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] The intra-and intervisit reproducibility of SD-OCT circumpapillary RNFL measures has recently been enhanced by eye tracking and registration technology, typically yielding an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) greater than 90% and coefficient of variation below 4.0%. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Despite the addition of eye tracking technology, many infants, toddlers, and young children frequently cannot cooperate with traditional table-mounted SD-OCT imaging due to their young age and or comorbid medical conditions. The development of a handheld SD-OCT has enabled pediatric practitioners to acquire high resolution images of the circumpapillary RNFL and macula in neonates, infants and young children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work by Cettomai et al [16] showed good levels of inter-rater and test-retest reliability for OCT 3 (Stratus) measurements of RNFL thickness in patients with MS and disease-free controls. A more recent study, however, demonstrated that high-resolution Fourier domain OCT techniques afford an even greater degree of reproducibility of RNFL thickness and macular volume assessments [32]. This prospective study of inter-visit, interrater, and intra-rater reproducibility was performed using Cirrus high-resolution OCT.…”
Section: Role For Oct In Modeling Axonal and Neuronal Loss In Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 58 patients with MS and 32 healthy controls, there was excellent reproducibility of average and quadrantic RNFL thickness values, average macular thickness, and total macular volume; intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.92 to 0.97 for inter-visit, 0.94 to 0.99 for inter-rater, and 0.83 to 0.99 for intra-rater reproducibility. The authors suggested that, in addition to implementing highresolution Fourier domain technology, the utilization of specific procedures, such as the reading of algorithms and quality control, can serve to optimize the quality of OCT data [32].…”
Section: Role For Oct In Modeling Axonal and Neuronal Loss In Msmentioning
confidence: 99%