2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.09.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of In Vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy Using an Automated Analysis Program for Detection of Diabetic Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certainly in the present study the inter- and intra-observer repeatability was maximal for CNFL. Ostrovski et al have recently shown that corneal nerve parameters differ significantly when using two different protocols; a semi-automated (2 images) and fully automated (all captured images) protocol for the quantification of corneal nerve parameters [ 14 ]. In contrast with Ostrovski et al, our study shows that by following a standardized protocol, corneal nerve parameters did not differ significantly when analyzing 6 images or 12 images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Certainly in the present study the inter- and intra-observer repeatability was maximal for CNFL. Ostrovski et al have recently shown that corneal nerve parameters differ significantly when using two different protocols; a semi-automated (2 images) and fully automated (all captured images) protocol for the quantification of corneal nerve parameters [ 14 ]. In contrast with Ostrovski et al, our study shows that by following a standardized protocol, corneal nerve parameters did not differ significantly when analyzing 6 images or 12 images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies use different protocols for selecting the number and type of images used for quantification of corneal nerve parameters. There are very few studies, which have assessed whether or not these protocols are reproducible [ 14 ]. The purpose of this study was to establish the intra and inter-rater reproducibility of a standardized protocol for image selection and to define the optimal image sample size, which could be deployed in multicenter studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with diabetes, CCM can detect loss of corneal nerve fibers in the SBNP of the central cornea, [6][7][8][9][10][11]27,28 which has been associated with the severity of peripheral neuropathy, suggesting that this method can be used as an alternative marker of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. [6][7][8]10,11,28 A previous experimental study using CCM and immunohistochemical staining revealed that the SBNP exhibits no changes in type 1 diabetes, but is reduced in type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) has been used to evaluate small nerve fibers in the cornea. Such studies have revealed that the density of nerve fibers in the subbasal nerve plexus (SBNP) correlates with the severity of diabetic neuropathy in human patients, [6][7][8][9][10][11] suggesting that such analyses represent an alternative, noninvasive marker of peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated number of people experiencing the ocular discomfort due to dry eye disorder ranges from 25 till 30 million around the world (Patel and McGhee, 2013). It is more common in women especially over 50 years of age due to autoimmune diseases (Ostrovski et al, 2015). The frequency of dry eye disorder is more prevalent in older age groups (Edwards et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%