2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00044-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of morphoscopic contrast sensitivity testing with the Visual Capacity Analyzer

Abstract: At the spatial frequencies examined, morphoscopic contrast sensitivity testing using the VCA had a high level of reproducibility and may be useful in measuring a patient's visual function in the actual environment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The visual acuity had improved after laser refractive surgery but most patients have reported blurring and glare symptoms (8). Their vision is also susceptible to the changes in illumination and contrast (2, 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The visual acuity had improved after laser refractive surgery but most patients have reported blurring and glare symptoms (8). Their vision is also susceptible to the changes in illumination and contrast (2, 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a sine-wave grating system, the contrast sensitivity is 3 or 5 times more sensitive than the letter acuity (13). This study used the VCA, which assesses overall visual function with difference modes (8). Lee et al (8) reported that the reliability coefficient ranged from 89.1% to 99.8% under maximum background luminance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To assess repeatability of our device, one randomly chosen condition was then repeated at the end of the session. While repeat measures taken over a longer time interval may be closer to clinical practice, intra-session repeatability measurement excludes subject variability over longer time scales and is thus a common method to assess the measurement itself 343840436162.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%