2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive and developmental toxicity of inhaled 2,3-dichloro-1,3-butadiene in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FNT significantly decreased epididymis weight but increased testis weight. In this study, the reduction in the weight of reproductive organs, such as the epididymis, could be due to the reduction of androgen availability (23). The increase in the weight of the testes induced by chemicals can be correlated with testicular swelling, followed by atrophy (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FNT significantly decreased epididymis weight but increased testis weight. In this study, the reduction in the weight of reproductive organs, such as the epididymis, could be due to the reduction of androgen availability (23). The increase in the weight of the testes induced by chemicals can be correlated with testicular swelling, followed by atrophy (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The reduced weight gained could be attributed to systemic toxicity in male rats (23). FNT significantly decreased epididymis weight but increased testis weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were assessed for normality and variance homogeneity by Levene's test. Tests of significance were performed using Dunnett's test after ANOVA analysis (Dunnett, 1980;Mylchreest et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance using Levene's test. Tests of significance were performed using Dunnett's test following an ANOVA analysis (Dunnett, 1980; Mylchreest et al, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%