1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04667.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN CALOPTERYX (ODONATA: CALOPTERYGIDAE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other odonate genera (e.g., Calopteryx , Hetaerina , and Plathemis ) have wing markings that are involved in both species recognition and various types of intraspecific sexual selection (e.g., Koenig and Albano 1987; Koenig 1991; Grether 1996; Svensson et al 2006). For example, Calopteryx damselflies in both North America and Eurasia show character displacement of wing marking patterns in areas where multiple species occur sympatrically, which suggests that aspects of these marking patterns are used to discriminate conspecifics from heterospecifics (Waage 1975, 1979; Tynkkynen et al 2004; Svensson et al 2007). In addition, aspects of these wing markings are under sexual and countervailing natural selection pressures, which can cause populations within species to diverge in aspects of these marking patterns as well (e.g., Svensson et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other odonate genera (e.g., Calopteryx , Hetaerina , and Plathemis ) have wing markings that are involved in both species recognition and various types of intraspecific sexual selection (e.g., Koenig and Albano 1987; Koenig 1991; Grether 1996; Svensson et al 2006). For example, Calopteryx damselflies in both North America and Eurasia show character displacement of wing marking patterns in areas where multiple species occur sympatrically, which suggests that aspects of these marking patterns are used to discriminate conspecifics from heterospecifics (Waage 1975, 1979; Tynkkynen et al 2004; Svensson et al 2007). In addition, aspects of these wing markings are under sexual and countervailing natural selection pressures, which can cause populations within species to diverge in aspects of these marking patterns as well (e.g., Svensson et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sexually isolating trait may be a morphological or signaling system character. It may also simply be the species discrimination ability of individuals; i.e., the mechanism (morphological, behavioral, or otherwise) by which an individual recognizes another individual as either a conspecific or a heterospecific (Waage 1979;Butlin 1989;. The process that leads to displacement, selection against hybridization, is known as reinforcement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further evidence of reinforcement’s role in divergence between sympatric and allopatric populations can be gleaned from systems that show variation in selection against hybridization. In these systems, sympatric populations of a given species that experience stronger selection against hybridization show more pronounced trait divergence (and greater reproductive isolation) from heterospecifics—and ancestral allopatric populations—than those sympatric populations with weaker selection against hybridization ( Waage 1975 , 1979 ; Pfennig and Pfennig 2005 ). Evaluating whether trait divergence in pairwise contrasts between sympatric populations versus allopatric populations predicts reproductive isolation between them would test the efficacy of reinforced traits in reproductive isolation.…”
Section: How Might the Hypothesis That Reinforcement Initiates Speciamentioning
confidence: 99%