1988
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1988.318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive factors and risk of cervical cancer by cell type. A prospective study

Abstract: Observed relationships between reproductive factors and cervical cancer have generally been regarded as secondary to associations with sexual habits (Kelsey & Hildreth, 1983). However, in a recent case-control study (Brinton et al., 1987a) the effect of the number of births was not eliminated by control for age at first intercourse or number of sexual partners. Furthermore, both that study (Brinton et al., 1987b) and recent reports on trends in incidence (Peters et al., 1986;Eide, 1987) indicate that adenocarc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Case -case studies have generally found adenocarcinoma to be more strongly associated than squamous cell carcinoma with nulliparity (Tasker and Collins 1974;Korhonen, 1980;Milsom and Friberg 1983;Silcocks et al, 1987), but these studies are difficult to interpret as most of them lack adequate adjustment for potential confounding factors. Previous studies of cervical cancer have found age at first birth to be an independent risk factor for squamous cell , but not for adenocarcinoma (Kvale et al, 1988;Parazzini et al, 1988, Bjorge andKravdal, 1996;Ursin et al, 1996;Munoz et al, 2002;Altekruse et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Case -case studies have generally found adenocarcinoma to be more strongly associated than squamous cell carcinoma with nulliparity (Tasker and Collins 1974;Korhonen, 1980;Milsom and Friberg 1983;Silcocks et al, 1987), but these studies are difficult to interpret as most of them lack adequate adjustment for potential confounding factors. Previous studies of cervical cancer have found age at first birth to be an independent risk factor for squamous cell , but not for adenocarcinoma (Kvale et al, 1988;Parazzini et al, 1988, Bjorge andKravdal, 1996;Ursin et al, 1996;Munoz et al, 2002;Altekruse et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Altekruse et al (2003) found an inverse relationship between parity and cervical adenocarcinoma risk. No association with parity for either adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix was found in two cohort studies (Kvale et al, 1988;Bjorge and Kravdal, 1996). Case -case studies have generally found adenocarcinoma to be more strongly associated than squamous cell carcinoma with nulliparity (Tasker and Collins 1974;Korhonen, 1980;Milsom and Friberg 1983;Silcocks et al, 1987), but these studies are difficult to interpret as most of them lack adequate adjustment for potential confounding factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrary to the present study others studies shows no association of multiparity with cervical carcinoma. [12][13][14] In the present study Leucorrhoea or discharge per vaginum was the most common symptom. These findings were consistent with those of Rose and Jean, Das and Bhargava, who also found discharge per vaginum, was the commonest symptom in lesions of the cervix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyway, as our reference group was the entire population with the mean number of 1.5 -1.7 births per woman during the study period (www.stat.fi), the RR estimates might have been larger, when compared to nulliparous women. There are also studies which do not show any role for multiparity in the aetiology of CC or CIN (Rotkin, 1973;Kvale et al, 1988;Cuzick et al, 1996). In those studies, crude RRs of CC were 0.6 -2.3 for women with five or more pregnancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%