Reproductive performance of repeat breeders in dairy herds

Yusuf, Muhammad; Nakao, Toshihiko; Ranasinghe, Rms Bimalka Kumari; Gautam, Gokarna; Long, Su Thanh; Yoshida, Chikako; Koike, Kana; Hayashi, Akimune

doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.01.016

Cited by 95 publications

(104 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…No comments on possible causes of RB were made by the near about fifteen percent farmers during the survey. Heuwieser et al, 1997;Pursley et al, 1998;Yousuf et al, 2010a, Hallap et al, 2006and Morrel, 2006 were agreed within the results of present findings who reported the quality feed, semen quality, inadequate heat detection, timing of insemination, insemination technique and reproductive diseases in dairy cows were the main factors of RB. Garge et al (2008) reported that balanced feeding is the mandatory factor for successful breeding in dairy cattle production.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 91%

Identification of possible causes of repeat breeding in dairy cows at Baghabari milk shed areas, Sirajgonj, Bangladesh

Islam¹,

Deb²,

Nurunnahar³

et al. 2017

Asian J. Med. Biol. Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study was conducted at milk pocket areas Sahjadpur Upazila under Sirajgonj district and Shathia and Bera Upazila under the Pabna district, respectively. A total number of one hundred ninety (190) dairy farmers were surveyed randomly selecting twenty farmers from each village. All data collected were statistically analyzed using Univariate General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of SPSS computer program. Lack of balanced feed was the highest cause of repeat breeding claimed by about sixty (60%) percent farmers in this study. The highest incidence of RB was obtained in LocalHolstein Friesian crosses (69%) and lowest in LocalSahiwal crosses (8%). From the study of present findings; it can be concluded that genotype, nutrient of feed, quality of semen, frequency of insemination and reproductive problems are the main possible causes for RB in the studied areas.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 91%

Identification of possible causes of repeat breeding in dairy cows at Baghabari milk shed areas, Sirajgonj, Bangladesh

Islam¹,

Deb²,

Nurunnahar³

et al. 2017

Asian J. Med. Biol. Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Repeat breeding is one of the major problems affecting reproductive efficiency and is a major source of economic waste in dairy herds (Bartlett et al 1986;Canu et al 2010;Yusuf et al 2010). The syndrome contributes to lower dairy profit due to the wastage of semen, insemination costs, increasing intervals to conception, increasing culling and replacement costs and loss of genetic gain through increased generation intervals (Bartlett et al 1986) and reduced fertility (Garcia-Ispierto et al 2007).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, it is important to identify causes of repeat breeding in order to deal with this problem. The incidence of repeat breeding increases in response to inadequate oestrus detection (Heuwieser et al 1997;Pursley et al 1998), resulting in errors in timing of insemination in relation to the onset of standing oestrus, or insemination of cows not in oestrus (Yusuf et al 2010). Other potential factors have also been suggested, such as quality of semen and insemination technique (Hallap et al 2006;Morrell 2006), uterine and/or cervical/vaginal infections (Moss et al 2002), endocrine disorders (Gustafsson 1998;Bage et al 2002;Lopez-Gatius et al 2004), ovulation failures (Kimura et al 1987;Silvia 1994), obstructed oviducts, defective ova, anatomical defects of the reproductive tract (Silvia 1994), and early embryonic death (Gustafsson 1998;Bage et al 2002).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other potential factors have also been suggested, such as quality of semen and insemination technique (Hallap et al 2006;Morrell 2006), uterine and/or cervical/vaginal infections (Moss et al 2002), endocrine disorders (Gustafsson 1998;Bage et al 2002;Lopez-Gatius et al 2004), ovulation failures (Kimura et al 1987;Silvia 1994), obstructed oviducts, defective ova, anatomical defects of the reproductive tract (Silvia 1994), and early embryonic death (Gustafsson 1998;Bage et al 2002). Lower parity, abnormal resumption of postpartum ovarian cycles, and shorter days in milk Veterinarni Medicina, 60, 2015 (5): 227-234 doi: 10.17221/8174-VETMED at first AI were identified as risk factors for repeat breeding (Yusuf et al 2010). Barlett et al (1986) reported that there was no association between breeding season and repeat breeding syndrome.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of season on plasma progesterone profiles in repeat breeding cows

Ghanem¹,

Nishibori²

2015

Vet. Med. - Czech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Forty six Holstein Friesian repeat breeding cows (the average AI/conception was 5.2 ± 0.2) were investigated using the progesterone assay after AI to determine possible differences in plasma progesterone profiles between summer and winter seasons. Twenty eight (60.9%) and 18 (39.1%) cows were followed in summer (June-August) and winter (December-February), respectively. In the summer season, the total progesterone concentrations were higher (P < 0.05) in pregnant cows with normal luteal function compared to those in non-pregnant animals with abnormal luteal function. In contrast, in the winter season, there was no difference (P = 0.12) in total progesterone concentrations between pregnant and non-pregnant cows with normal or abnormal luteal functions. When the progesterone concentrations were compared, the pregnant and non-pregnant cows with normal luteal functions exhibited no difference (P = 0.92) in summer and winter seasons. Thus, the present study indicates that there is no effect of season on plasma progesterone profiles in repeat breeding cows; however in the summer season, the total progesterone concentrations were considerably higher in pregnant cows with normal luteal function compared to non-pregnant cows with abnormal luteal function.

show abstract

“…Caso persistam por três inseminações consecutivas sem sinais clínicos aparentes, são ora denominadas vacas repetidoras de cio. A incidência dessa síndrome varia de acordo com a região, ambiente e manejo dos rebanhos e tem sido relatado a incidência de 14% e 62% em vacas Holandesas (YUSUF et al, 2010(YUSUF et al, , 2012 Espera-se que o animal retorne a sua atividade cíclica ovariana rapidamente após o parto, além da ocorrência das etapas de involução uterina, regeneração do endométrio e eliminação da infecção bacteriana, sendo o estímulo inicial para ocorrer estas mudanças à expulsão do feto, das membranas fetais e da lóquia (SHELDON et al, 2008). Caso haja deficiência em uma ou mais etapas deste processo e a presença de bactérias patogênicas, poderá então haver a instalação de infecções uterinas e, possivelmente, a infertilidade do animal DOBSON, 2004).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Avaliação ginecológica e citológica em vacas Holandesas com mais de três repetições de cio

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoA eficiência reprodutiva é um dos principais fatores envolvidos na viabilidade econômica do setor de criação de bovinos. Objetivou-se realizar a avaliação ginecológica e citológica em vacas Holandesas com mais de três repetições de cio. O experimento foi desenvolvido em seis propriedades leiteiras comerciais, com manejos sanitários e reprodutivos semelhantes e assistidas por médicos veterinários. Foram incluídas apenas vacas da raça Holandesa, até cinco parições e mais de três repetições de cio consecutivas. Na propriedade, os animais foram identificados e procedidos o exame ginecológico e citologia endometrial. No presente estudo foram avaliadas 77 vacas e as causas reprodutivas encontradas em vacas Holandesas sujeitas ao descarte involuntário foram: endometrite clínica com secreção vaginal purulenta e mais que 3% de neutrófilos (7,79%), endometrite clínica com secreção vaginal purulenta e menos que 3% de neutrófilos (2,6%), endometrite subclínica (10,4%), urovagina (1,3%) e 77,9% que não se sabe a causa, porém não está associado aos distúrbios reprodutivos avaliados. Concluiu-se que: a) o índice de vacas que não apresentaram a causa diagnosticada é muito alto e isto interfere diretamente na eficiência reprodutiva; b) o exame proposto diagnosticou 22,1% de distúrbios clínicos que poderiam ser evitados ou tratados e desta forma reduzindo o descarte involuntário. Palavras-chave: Bovinos, endometrite clínica, endometrite subclínica, urovagina AbstractThe objective of this study was to evaluate the gynecological examination and endometrial cytology in Holstein cows with more than three repetitions of estrus. The experiment was conducted in six commercial dairy herds both with similar reproductive and sanitary managements and assisted by veterinarians. It was included only Holstein cows up to five calving and more than three consecutive repetitions of estrus. Seventy-seven cows were identified and carried gynecological examination and endometrial cytology. The reproductive causes found in this study, subject to involuntary culling, were: clinical endometritis 1 Médicos Veterinários autônomos, Uberlândia, MG.

show abstract

Reproductive performance of repeat breeders in dairy herds

Cited by 95 publications

References 40 publications

Identification of possible causes of repeat breeding in dairy cows at Baghabari milk shed areas, Sirajgonj, Bangladesh

Identification of possible causes of repeat breeding in dairy cows at Baghabari milk shed areas, Sirajgonj, Bangladesh

Effects of season on plasma progesterone profiles in repeat breeding cows

Avaliação ginecológica e citológica em vacas Holandesas com mais de três repetições de cio

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About