2010
DOI: 10.4995/wrs.1993.199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive Response of Prepubertal Female Rabbit to Photoperiod and/or Male Presence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lighting programs are widely used in avian species. Moreover, supplemental lighting programs produced positive effects on female reproductive precocity, kindling rate, and litter size at birth in rabbits under tropical conditions in Nigeria and Guadeloupe (Berepubo et al 1993;Depres et al 1996). Moreover, in seasonally breeding Syrian hamsters, day length influenced the copulatory behavior as males ceased to display ejaculatory behavior after several weeks of exposure to short day lengths (Powers et al 1989;Miernicki et al 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lighting programs are widely used in avian species. Moreover, supplemental lighting programs produced positive effects on female reproductive precocity, kindling rate, and litter size at birth in rabbits under tropical conditions in Nigeria and Guadeloupe (Berepubo et al 1993;Depres et al 1996). Moreover, in seasonally breeding Syrian hamsters, day length influenced the copulatory behavior as males ceased to display ejaculatory behavior after several weeks of exposure to short day lengths (Powers et al 1989;Miernicki et al 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the precise nature of the pheromones or signals supposedly exchanged between the male and female rabbits is unknown. However, it appears that male presence is beneficial to receptivity and fertility in nulliparous does (Lefèvre et al, 1976;Berepudo et al, 1993) but not in lactating does (Kustos et al, 2000;Eiben et al, 2001;Bonanno et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors indicate that doe sexual heat is greater on the first day than on the tenth day post-partum (Perrier et al, 1982;Surdeau et al, 1982). Cudnovskii (1957) and Berepubo et al (1993) claimed that the natural receptivity cycle of a doe is 5 to 7 days, with duration as short as 6 to 7 hours during some times of the year. Our study agrees with the previous results because we used doe on the next day after delivery.…”
Section: Receptivity and Conception Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "buck presence" is intended for the continuous contacts of visual, auditory, olfactory and tactile between the male and female (McNitt, 1992 andBerepubo et al, 1993). Several Studies have demonstrated that separation of the doe from its litter for short periods of time is very effective in stimulating ovarian activity of the doe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%