1979
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320030208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive risk of t(13q14q) carriers: Case report and review

Abstract: We report a four-generation kindred with a balanced 13q14q Robertsonian translocation. The proband had the Down sydrome, due to trisomy of chromosome 21; he also carried the balanced D-group translocation. S segregation analysis of 86 sibships was performed to examine the risk of t(13q14q) carrier parents having trisomy 21, 47,XXY, or trisomy 13 children by which a number of families were ascertained. None of these disorders recurred after birth of the propositi. The frequency of abortions was not different fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is commonly assumed that the overall miscarriage risk for der(13;14) carriers is not significantly different from the background risk of approximately 15% [Warburton and Fraser, 1964; Scriven et al, 2001] and that there is only an occasional association between der(13;14) and miscarriage [Gardner and Sutherland, 2004]. This is mainly based on the study of Harris et al [1979] resulting in miscarriage risks of 16% for female and 9% for male carriers. In the said study, the miscarriage frequency for male carriers seemed to be even significantly lower than the background risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is commonly assumed that the overall miscarriage risk for der(13;14) carriers is not significantly different from the background risk of approximately 15% [Warburton and Fraser, 1964; Scriven et al, 2001] and that there is only an occasional association between der(13;14) and miscarriage [Gardner and Sutherland, 2004]. This is mainly based on the study of Harris et al [1979] resulting in miscarriage risks of 16% for female and 9% for male carriers. In the said study, the miscarriage frequency for male carriers seemed to be even significantly lower than the background risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For lack of alternatives, the risk figures determined in some of these older studies are still widely cited although some of them used ascertainment correction methods, which seriously influenced the resulting risk figures. This is exemplified by a study of Harris et al [1979] in which all miscarriages with unknown karyotype were excluded from the analysis. As a consequence of this over‐correction, the resulting miscarriage risks of 16% for female and 9% for male carriers were very low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a significant excess of carrier offspring from the expected 50% (37). The segregation ratios range from 0.55 to 0.66 (40,78). Carriers of ROB are at significant risk for chromosome malsegregation and aneuploid offspring.…”
Section: Segregation Ratios In Familial Rearrangementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, in view of the literature and our results, we argue that classic genetic counseling for Robertsonian translocation, predicated upon a mean incidence of aneuploidy, is not realistic for couples in certain risk categories (15% risk of miscarriage [21] and 2% risk of aneuploid fetus [22]), although our series is small and needs confirmatory investigations. The obstetric natural history (previous miscarriage or fetal/child aneuploidy) must be taken into account.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%