2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-007-0134-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproductive success and nestling diet in the Lesser Spotted Woodpecker (Picoides minor): the early bird gets the caterpillar

Abstract: Populations of Lesser Spotted Woodpecker (Picoides minor) are decreasing in size, necessitating management strategies. However, data on the reproductive biology of this species are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of timing of breeding and nestling diet on the reproductive success of the Lesser Spotted Woodpecker and thereby contribute to an understanding of the determinants influencing its reproductive success. During 6 study years between 1996-2003, we investigated various varia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rossmanith et al 2007). Since wood-boring larvae were the main food, and these are thought to be equally available year-round (Vergara and Schlatter 2004;Ojeda and Chazarreta 2006), homogeneity in the nestlings' main diet is not surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Rossmanith et al 2007). Since wood-boring larvae were the main food, and these are thought to be equally available year-round (Vergara and Schlatter 2004;Ojeda and Chazarreta 2006), homogeneity in the nestlings' main diet is not surprising.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Various aspects of the Lesser Spotted Woodpecker’s breeding ecology have been studied in Europe, such as reproductive success (Rossmanith et al. 2007), parental care and social mating (Wiktander et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2007), parental care and social mating (Wiktander et al. 2000), nestling diet (Rossmanith et al. 2007), foraging routines (Olsson et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in a population of Great Tits, in which desertion was provoked in a subset of nests by an experimental clutch reduction on day 8 of incubation, the probability of desertion did not differ between early and late breeders (Verboven 1998). Either negative or positive association between laying date and the desertion probability is expected based on the assumption of a seasonal decline in re-laying opportunities and seasonal deterioration of the offspring quality (Bauchau and Seinen 1997;Fernandez and Reboreda 2000;Rossmanith et al 2007). Such an association, in most cases with latelaid clutches being more often deserted than early-laid ones, have been found for example in the Collared Flycatcher, the Fan-tailed Warbler (Cisticola juncidis), the Greater Rhea (Rhea americana), the Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) and the Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia) (Cavalcanti 1981;Newton and Marquiss 1984;Ueda 1987;Wiggins et al 1994;Fernandez and Reboreda 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the model of Webb et al (2002), it was predicted that body condition and laying date interact to affect the propensity for desertion in response to human disturbance: as the season progresses, the body condition threshold for deserting females would increase. Given that body condition and laying date affect the desertion probability independently of each other, it was predicted that: (1) birds in worse condition are either more (because of low expected reproductive value of the clutch) or less (because of very limited future breeding opportunities in this species) prone to desert the clutch, and (2) the probability of clutch desertion decreases with the advancement of the season because the chances of laying and successful rearing of the replacement clutch late in the season are constrained by food availability and time (Bauchau and Seinen 1997;Fernandez and Reboreda 2000), or alternatively (3) the probability of clutch desertion increases with the advancement of the season because the value of the offspring, measured as, e.g., body mass and immune function, declines with the progress of the season Rossmanith et al 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%