2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reprogrammable flexible mechanical metamaterials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seeds were generated in unit cells and the center unit cell was defined as an RVE. The same approach was employed for 2D design in our previous study [ 17 ]. The Voronoi skeleton was derived from the polyhedral meshes of the Voronoi diagram.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The seeds were generated in unit cells and the center unit cell was defined as an RVE. The same approach was employed for 2D design in our previous study [ 17 ]. The Voronoi skeleton was derived from the polyhedral meshes of the Voronoi diagram.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, recent advances in additive manufacturing have enabled the fabrication of complicated structures using multimaterials [ 18 , 19 ], shape memory polymers [ 20–22 ], and magnetic materials [ 23 , 24 ]. Thus, the rational design of architected cellular materials makes them promising candidates for soft robotics [ 18 , 23–25 ], actuators [ 16 , 17 , 26 ], soft electronics [ 27 , 28 ], tissue engineering [ 29–32 ], and electrochemical energy storage and conversion [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once manufactured, however, their as-built architecture is permanently imprinted with snapthrough characteristics that cannot be changed in service through a mechanical input unless a field-responsive material is used and triggered by the application of an external physical field, such as a thermal or electromagnetic stimulus. [21,33,34] As a result, current concepts that do not rely on a physical stimulus cannot switch their mechanical response in situ, for example from snap-through to monotonic, because their snap-thorough instability cannot be intrinsically deactivated post-fabrication. This immutability prevents them from behaving as conventional materials delivering a monotonic stress-strain relation, and from using them in a multitude-even larger-spectrum of ordinary applications where snapping instabilities are detrimental.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aim to establish and harness a one-to-one mapping between temperature and nonlinear mechanical behavior through the metamaterial. In the literature, a widely adopted approach to achieve temperature-dependent behaviors is using shape memory materials that actuate and alter mechanical behaviors (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), such as deformation modes (20) and effective properties (19). However, the accompanied shape changes in the unloaded states may not suit applications requiring functional changes, such as force-displacement (FD) responses dissociated from shape changes and free of external power or intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%