2017
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2017.2675900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reputation-Based Resource Allocation in P2P Systems: A Game Theoretic Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, some personal characteristics appear to catalyze reputation social influence (i.e., favoring the decision-making biases based on reputation), while others act in the opposite direction as "protective" factors. Our results can be useful to design web-based services and platforms, in particular in those cases in which reputation biases would represent a factor reducing the system's effectiveness and robustness [55][56][57][58]. Table 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, some personal characteristics appear to catalyze reputation social influence (i.e., favoring the decision-making biases based on reputation), while others act in the opposite direction as "protective" factors. Our results can be useful to design web-based services and platforms, in particular in those cases in which reputation biases would represent a factor reducing the system's effectiveness and robustness [55][56][57][58]. Table 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to denote the entire sensitivity profile of the 2 agents. Consequently, agents' decision behaviors (6) with the loss-aversion-based sensitivity (7) and the quadratic payoff functions (2) under mode k ∈ K {LL, HL, LH, HH} are described aṡ…”
Section: B Loss-aversion-based Myopic Pseudo-gradient Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the rotational directions of the trajectories are consistently the same in the entire state space R 2 . Specifically, if a 1 12 < 0 and a 2 12 > 0 (resp., a 1 12 > 0 and a 2 12 < 0), then the trajectory of (6), 7, keeps counterclockwise (resp., clockwise) direction for any…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gupta et al (2015) described a scheme of reputation-based probabilistic resource allocation for avoiding free riding in unstructured P2P networks. Goswami et al (2017) considered reputation-based resource allocation in P2P networks and analyzed a resource allocation mechanism by using two non-cooperative games: the demand game and the reputation game.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%