2010
DOI: 10.1080/01419870903549011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reputational geographies and urban social cohesion

Abstract: This article adds to recent literature in migration studies on the importance of place and space by drawing on extended interviews with residents in the Alum Rock area of East Birmingham. Our central theme is the exploration of reputational geographies; the symbolic and material boundaries drawn around places as indicators of social status, sites of memories, and repositories of affect that can have profound socio-economic as well as emotional consequences for city residents. We argue that research and policy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, stigma created through ''defensive othering'' in Stockton-on-Tees was not only associated with class or with the local area, but also with ethnicity (Keene and Padilla 2010), particularly when participants discussed the Town Centre. This resulted in 'symbolic and material boundaries' (Parker andKarner, 2010: 1452) being formed, which can then lead to social isolation and a withdraw from collective life that has a negative effect upon health and wellbeing (Keene and Padilla 2014). In seeking to tackle place-based stigma and its capacity to both negatively impact on health and reinforce social inequalities (Keene and Padilla, 2014) the importance of challenging popular discourses around stigmatized places promoted in political rhetoric (Hancock and Mooney 2013) and mass media representation is key.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, stigma created through ''defensive othering'' in Stockton-on-Tees was not only associated with class or with the local area, but also with ethnicity (Keene and Padilla 2010), particularly when participants discussed the Town Centre. This resulted in 'symbolic and material boundaries' (Parker andKarner, 2010: 1452) being formed, which can then lead to social isolation and a withdraw from collective life that has a negative effect upon health and wellbeing (Keene and Padilla 2014). In seeking to tackle place-based stigma and its capacity to both negatively impact on health and reinforce social inequalities (Keene and Padilla, 2014) the importance of challenging popular discourses around stigmatized places promoted in political rhetoric (Hancock and Mooney 2013) and mass media representation is key.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular perceptions of localities are the modality through which ethnicity is lived and Islamophobia and racism are experienced. Places are contexts where diverse processes intersect and are lived in different ways (Parker and Karner, 2010). We found a very strong affirmation of the quality of local life in Beeston, Hyde Park and Dewsbury.…”
Section: Perceptions Of Locality Neighbourhood and Segregationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Beeston, Dewsbury and Hyde Park amongst other places developed strongly negative reputational geographies after the 7/7 bombings (Parker and Karner, 2010). Media and political discourses constructed the places as dysfunctional and creating the 7/7 bombers (Seidler, 2007).…”
Section: Perceptions Of Locality Neighbourhood and Segregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now I've no doubt that in the Peterboroughs of this world... they sit in the pubs and they worry about all these East Europeans flooding in, picking all our tomatoes or carrots, or in Dagenham, they think that this is the final straw, Ford closes down, and nobody cares about us, and now they're dumping all these foreigners on us, and so on... but I think that that's an atypical perspective for London. Now I've no idea whether it's (Parker and Karner 2010). This is not simply a regional geography of antagonism between, as Massey (2007, p.116) puts it, 'London' and 'the Rest of the UK'; rather it is based on relations between local units of governance, around which ideas of responsibility, shared belonging, and history have grown (or are sought).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%