2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2015.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Requirements and languages for the semantic representation of manufacturing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This way, physical and virtual dimensions coexist and are synchronized in real-time [19]. However, synchronization requires full data models of alternative scenarios to be simulated [32][33][34]. This issue led to the concept of Digital Twin (DT), or a virtual representation of physical objects coping their behaviour through a real-time data acquisition from the field [16,35].…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way, physical and virtual dimensions coexist and are synchronized in real-time [19]. However, synchronization requires full data models of alternative scenarios to be simulated [32][33][34]. This issue led to the concept of Digital Twin (DT), or a virtual representation of physical objects coping their behaviour through a real-time data acquisition from the field [16,35].…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated and thoroughly discussed by Ramos [16] and Sanfilippo et al [36], to date, generally accepted manufacturing ontologies are lacking; there is no standard ontology for materials, products, resources, processes, or manufacturing systems. Moreover, ontology languages have different levels of expressivity, making careful process of evaluation for each use case necessary [37].…”
Section: Semantic Web Technologies For Mps According Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e hierarchal classification of process selection knowledge alone is not sufficient to capture causal relationships. Semantic web rule language (SWRL) is an effective method to represent causal relations and has been widely applied in knowledge systems [37]. SWRL rules need to be considered to enable deductive reasoning and knowledge retrieval.…”
Section: Rules and Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it comes as no surprise that the application of OWL ontologies in the representation of product information (including tolerance information) is gaining importance and popularity within the academia [81][82][83][84][85]. However, the OWL ontology-based model is probably not an efficient representation model for tolerance information as a whole, because OWL ontology has drawbacks in the aspects of degree of automation, time complexity, additional work, and negation in the model [80].…”
Section: Ontology-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%