2012
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2012.747017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Requirements for labelling forest polygons in an object-based image analysis classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the six observed study areas a total of 31 tree species were observed (Table S1). Instead of a species specific classification, our analysis centered on the conventional Deciduous Forest, Mixed Forest, and Coniferous Forest partitioning defined by Justice et al, [5] and MacLean et al, [6]. Here we used the Anderson et al, [7] classification scheme definition for forests, being any area with 10 percent or greater aerial tree-crown density, which has the ability to produce lumber, and influences either the climate or hydrologic regime.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the six observed study areas a total of 31 tree species were observed (Table S1). Instead of a species specific classification, our analysis centered on the conventional Deciduous Forest, Mixed Forest, and Coniferous Forest partitioning defined by Justice et al, [5] and MacLean et al, [6]. Here we used the Anderson et al, [7] classification scheme definition for forests, being any area with 10 percent or greater aerial tree-crown density, which has the ability to produce lumber, and influences either the climate or hydrologic regime.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to both PBC sampling methods, this and other OBC samples used 30 × 30 m effective areas for visually interpreting their classification. The second OBC reference data collection method (method four) used these previous 30 × 30 m classified areas as subsamples to represent the compositional heterogeneity at the image object (forest stand) level [5,10]. Forest stands which did not convey a clear majority, based on the subsamples, were classified based on a decision ruleset shown in Table 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RS analysis for change detection is usually relying on digital satellite image classification by assigning image pixels to real-world LULC feature types (Paul et al, 2018). Pixel-based classification (PBC) is a conventional method and has been broadly applied as supervised and unsupervised classification based on characteristics of single pixel (MacLean et al, 2013;Rwanga and Ndambuki, 2017). However, when a pixel-by-pixel classification algorithm is applied to all available image signals, the pixels with similar spectral reflectance are grouped together, while some spatial and contextual information of image pixels are neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when a pixel-by-pixel classification algorithm is applied to all available image signals, the pixels with similar spectral reflectance are grouped together, while some spatial and contextual information of image pixels are neglected. Thus, the pixels may not represent true geographical objects when using PBC method, and its accuracy would be affected (MacLean et al, 2013;Blaschke et al, 2014). Compared with PBC, the object-based image analysis (OBIA) method generates segments from pixel-based features to produce higher classification accuracy by incorporating more information and cre-ating more recognizable segments (Frohn, 2011;Chen et al, 2013;Ma et al, 2017;Paul et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the optimal sample size is dependent on the classification scenario and the sampling design. It has been found that the optimal sample size for object-based accuracy assessment is smaller than that of pixel-based accuracy assessment (Radoux et al 2011;MacLean et al 2013). …”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%