2013 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (MTT) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/mwsym.2013.6697534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Requirements for reconfigurable 4G front-ends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, a 4G cellular RF front-end needs to support> 16 bands, 60 RF ports and 30 RF switches per RF port [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a 4G cellular RF front-end needs to support> 16 bands, 60 RF ports and 30 RF switches per RF port [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this leads to a reduced component count, it does not result in a reduction of parallel receive paths or a real change in architecture, and therefore does not decrease the complexity. As wireless standards evolved from 2G to 4G, the number of filters external to the receiver module increased from about 6 (2G) to 45 (4G), the number of RF ports of the transceiver increased from 10 to 60, and that the number of switch ports required for signal routing increased from 6 to 30 [58], altogether increasing the transceiver's complexity and cost drastically. Electronics remain affordable due to the integration on a single chip, thanks to scaling of VSLI processes (in particular, CMOS) and innovations in RF circuits and devices [12].…”
Section: B Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WiFi, WiMAX, LTE, WiBro, HiperLAN and etc.) [15][16][17][18][19][20]. The main reason is researchers and engineers have to design a RF front-end with less expensive and smaller size than simply putting multiple RF/microwave components next to each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%