Management of Insect Pests With Semiochemicals 1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3216-9_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research and Development of Pheromones for Insect Control with Emphasis on the Pink Bollworm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our mass trapping technique differs from current commercial pheromone mating disruption techniques for PBW in that low density of high pheromone dose point sources were positioned above the plant canopy. Our findings are in agreement with those of Doane & Brooks (1981), that PBW males are able to orient to traps emitting pheromone plumes of concentrations much higher than the background in field situations lacking constant unidirectional wind. Commercial techniques usually rely on a high density of low-dose point sources dispensed on the soil or on top of the leaves of cotton plants (e.g., fibers and microcapsulates), or on an intermediate density (1000 per ha) of high-dose point sources placed under the canopy, 10 cm above the ground, as for the PBW-rope r formulation (Flint et al, 1985;Staten et al, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our mass trapping technique differs from current commercial pheromone mating disruption techniques for PBW in that low density of high pheromone dose point sources were positioned above the plant canopy. Our findings are in agreement with those of Doane & Brooks (1981), that PBW males are able to orient to traps emitting pheromone plumes of concentrations much higher than the background in field situations lacking constant unidirectional wind. Commercial techniques usually rely on a high density of low-dose point sources dispensed on the soil or on top of the leaves of cotton plants (e.g., fibers and microcapsulates), or on an intermediate density (1000 per ha) of high-dose point sources placed under the canopy, 10 cm above the ground, as for the PBW-rope r formulation (Flint et al, 1985;Staten et al, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Gossyplure has been used successfully to suppress PBW populations in commercial cotton fields by disrupting chemical communication among the adult moths (Gaston et al, 1977;Brooks et al, 1979;Henneberry et al, 1981;Baker et al, 1990) and in part by attracting males to surfaces containing contact insecticide (Conlee & Staten, 1981). Several formulations of gossyplure are commercially available: hollow fibers (e.g., Doane & Brooks, 1981), flakes (e.g., Henneberry et al, 1981), microencapsulated formulations (e.g., Critchley et al, 1983;Flint & Merkle, 1984), and twist-on ropes (e.g., Flint et al, 1985;Staten et al, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hollow fibers, sealed near one end (Brooks et al 1979, Brooks andKitterman 1978). The results of extensive testing in Arizona and southern California indicated substantial reduction in boll infestations and in the need for chemical insecticides for PBW in the NoMate-PBW treated fields (Doane and Brooks 1980).…”
Section: Various Methods Of Pbw Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only has the system been proven to be cost effective, but improved quality of cotton has been demonstrated (Doane and Brooks 1981).…”
Section: Pheromonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic strategy for pink bollworm suppression is to apply the formulation at 15 g/acre formulation, about two weeks before first susceptible pin squares form on cotton (Doane and Brooks 1981). Although mated females may be present before this time, it is assumed that few will survive.…”
Section: Pheromonesmentioning
confidence: 99%