2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2744-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research and innovation in higher education: empirical evidence from research and patenting in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Industrial interactions with universities may be facilitated either by sending employees to a university for training or by firms investing in networking with a university. Faria et al (2018), however, show that innovation in Brazilian universities is negligible, and that universities' market evaluation is negatively related to innovation, suggesting that the focus on patenting and on the transfer of knowledge/technology to industrial processes is still precarious in Brazil. A study by Cowan and Zinovyeva (2013) investigates whether the development of a university system affected local industry innovation in Italy between 1985 and 2000.…”
Section: B Impacts Of Internal Experiencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Industrial interactions with universities may be facilitated either by sending employees to a university for training or by firms investing in networking with a university. Faria et al (2018), however, show that innovation in Brazilian universities is negligible, and that universities' market evaluation is negatively related to innovation, suggesting that the focus on patenting and on the transfer of knowledge/technology to industrial processes is still precarious in Brazil. A study by Cowan and Zinovyeva (2013) investigates whether the development of a university system affected local industry innovation in Italy between 1985 and 2000.…”
Section: B Impacts Of Internal Experiencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Covering only one particular innovation could over-or underestimate causal effect between an innovative change and its results [6]. For example, when assessing academic innovation, Chang et al [43] (2006) focus strictly on intellectual propertyrelated activities such as patenting, licensing, and incubated startups; Faria et al [44] (2018) compile an innovation indicator solely from the number of universityaffiliated patents; Hewitt-Dundas et al [45] observe only introductions of new study programs as an indicator of higher education innovation; Huang and Chen [46] use a number of published scientific papers and a number of patents to measure the academic innovation performance of universities; Lin [47] measures the impact of academic innovation simply as the number of paper citations received per university per year.…”
Section: Measuring Innovation In Heimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two types of innovations have received less attention than product and service innovation in the innovation literature [49][50]. From the perspective of defining HEI innovations, process and organizational innovations have been recognized [6,20,28] but from the perspective of measuring innovation in HEIs, they have mostly been ignored [9,34,36,44,46], something the proposed framework seeks to correct.…”
Section: Framework For Measuring Hei Innovativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesse sentido, citam-se trabalhos na área da computação (Bazzan e Argenta 2011;Laender et al 2008); educação (Coutinho et al 2012), economia (Haddad et al 2017;Guimarães 2011;Faria et al 2007) e ciências biológicas (Zorzetto et al 2006). Mais recentemente, a produção das universidades em termos de pesquisa e inovação tem sido contemplada pela cientometria brasileira (Faria et al 2018).…”
Section: Cientometriaunclassified