2019
DOI: 10.15173/ijsap.v3i2.3674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research assistant as partner: Collective leadership to facilitate co-production

Abstract: In this article, we chronicle our experience of student-faculty partnership within a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning design-based research study. We present our experience of partnership in relation to the student-faculty partnership, collective leadership, adult learning and knowledge building literatures. Key characteristics of our student-faculty partnership are recognizingand using intellectual and experiential resources; practicing principles of knowledge building; and differentiating top-down and la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We engaged in a process that encouraged all members of the design team to learn from one another and contribute ideas. We came into this partnership with different experiences and throughout our collaborative inquiry, we maintained a level of respect for the knowledge and expertise each team member brought with them which allowed us to be coproducers of knowledge (Hill et al, 2019). Our design team members had a robust understanding of protocols for giving and receiving constructive feedback; however, for teams with less experience, we recommend having explicit discussions on how to debrief and provide feedback to maintain a dialectic and open process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We engaged in a process that encouraged all members of the design team to learn from one another and contribute ideas. We came into this partnership with different experiences and throughout our collaborative inquiry, we maintained a level of respect for the knowledge and expertise each team member brought with them which allowed us to be coproducers of knowledge (Hill et al, 2019). Our design team members had a robust understanding of protocols for giving and receiving constructive feedback; however, for teams with less experience, we recommend having explicit discussions on how to debrief and provide feedback to maintain a dialectic and open process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiences of these projects have confirmed that there are a host of benefits to be gained from exploring partnership with students. These include benefits reported by Hill et al (2019), such as supporting a diversity of perspectives across the university, increased productivity, and synergistic learning opportunities for both staff and students. For example, Figure 1 shows the CUSEIP Uni placement student assisting with the trialling of an innovative whiteboard capture technology and cooperative learning between the student and staff.…”
Section: Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Figure 1 shows the CUSEIP Uni placement student assisting with the trialling of an innovative whiteboard capture technology and cooperative learning between the student and staff. Projects such as these can aid our understanding of the complex and messy area of student experience and provide access to diverse perspectives and marginalised voices (Hill et al, 2019). Additionally, the projects developed new and unexpected insights.…”
Section: Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations