2016
DOI: 10.1108/lr-01-2016-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research data management: a conceptual framework

Abstract: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper addressed several issues related to research data services, providing a patchy picture that intended to give insight into several essential and intriguing questions. None of the answers to these is final, but -even if slowly -researchers gradually will have to get accustomed to publishing not only manuscripts, but making research data open (Patel, 2016). Academic libraries may take the lead in this process, or -at least -it is necessary for them to reflect on new developments by filling the niches that appear in services, provided for researchers by other academic units.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper addressed several issues related to research data services, providing a patchy picture that intended to give insight into several essential and intriguing questions. None of the answers to these is final, but -even if slowly -researchers gradually will have to get accustomed to publishing not only manuscripts, but making research data open (Patel, 2016). Academic libraries may take the lead in this process, or -at least -it is necessary for them to reflect on new developments by filling the niches that appear in services, provided for researchers by other academic units.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining the quality of research data also should mean considering relevance to the given research question and format that comprises the fields and units used, naming conventions, dates of creation and update (Zilinski & Nelson, 2014). Issues, related to copyright, data licensing, data security, data privacy and to the danger of the erroneous interpretation of data also are tied to quality (Patel, 2016).…”
Section: Rds Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• The ownership of the copyright and other intellectual property rights in OS data is a critical issue [17].…”
Section: Open Science Data Characteristics and Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to implement RDM, the university needs to classify the data to ensure what data can be shared widely. For instance, Duke University classifies data based on the risk level: sensitive (high), restricted (medium), and public (low) [15], while Western University uses the following group: confidential, sensitive, and public [16,17]. These classifications are based on the existing law and regulation.…”
Section: Fig 3 the Barriers Of Data Sharing From Indonesia's Point Omentioning
confidence: 99%