2014
DOI: 10.1177/0141076813517679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research ethics policies and practices in health research institutions in sub-Saharan African countries: results of a questionnaire-based survey

Abstract: Objective: To describe the state of research ethics policies and practices in health research institutions in sub-Saharan African countries. Design: A structured questionnaire was used to solicit information on research ethics from health research institutions. Setting: Forty-two sub-Saharan African countries. Participants: Key informants from the health research institutions. Main outcome measures: Existence of institutional ethics review policies and mechanisms. Results: About half (51%) of respondent instit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Mbondji and colleagues¿ [ 20 ] questionnaire survey, 75% (33/44) of the countries reported to have functional ethical review committees. About 57% of the 847 health research institutions surveyed by Zielinski and colleagues [ 21 ] responded to the survey, with 51% of these reporting to have policies on research ethics, 58% to have written policies requiring researchers to obtain informed consent of research participants, 34% to have established ethics review committees, 42% to require that studies go through ethics review committees, 46% to have linkages with national or regional ethics organisations, 53% to have adopted standard operating procedures, and 36% to provide some type of ethics training for staff [ 36 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Mbondji and colleagues¿ [ 20 ] questionnaire survey, 75% (33/44) of the countries reported to have functional ethical review committees. About 57% of the 847 health research institutions surveyed by Zielinski and colleagues [ 21 ] responded to the survey, with 51% of these reporting to have policies on research ethics, 58% to have written policies requiring researchers to obtain informed consent of research participants, 34% to have established ethics review committees, 42% to require that studies go through ethics review committees, 46% to have linkages with national or regional ethics organisations, 53% to have adopted standard operating procedures, and 36% to provide some type of ethics training for staff [ 36 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies in the African Region have attempted to analyse the condition of individual components of health systems such as financing [ 15 ],[ 16 ], human resources [ 17 ], information and information systems [ 18 ], national research systems [ 19 ],[ 20 ], research ethics [ 21 ], and services [ 22 ]-[ 27 ], but no empirical study on leadership [ 28 ] and governance of health development [ 29 ] has been carried out. Also, there is a dearth of literature comprehensively synthesising the situation of health systems in the Region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge of research ethics enables setting and monitoring of ethical standards, and monitoring and evaluating the health research system. In a study of 42 sub-Saharan African countries, increasing research capacity top the list of identified obstacles to collaboration in research between stakeholders [18]. To strengthen collaborations between local and foreign researchers and encourage robust ethical dialogue between stakeholders in the research enterprise, there is need to bridge the knowledge gap between the local and foreign partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar study conducted in 2008 revealed that regulatory infrastructures and independent oversight processes that could minimize the risk of exploitation were not-so-firmly established; NECs were inadequately supported financially and could not maintain and sustain themselves; they were faced with operational challenges stemming from a dearth of trained bioethicists/ethicists and/or adequately experienced committee members skilled enough to undertake ethics review [ 4 , 5 ]. This raises concerns as to whether research ethics principles can be adequately enforced in these countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%