2019
DOI: 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2019.35.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Methodology for Hygienic Evaluation of Innovative Pedagogical Tecnology in Educational Organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Y. Milushkin, N. A. Skoblin, C. Meilstrup, L. Nielsen, M. Edraki, N. Parvizi, S. Montaseri, S. Pourahmad, are often narrowly targeted, of disciplinary nature, most often from the standpoint of medical hygiene (Kuchma et al, 2014(Kuchma et al, , 2019 without other aspects of safety evaluation of innovative tools used in the educational process (Eggermont, 2017;Genc, 2014;Ivantsova et al, 2018;Kluppels et al, 2017;Lai et al, 2015;Lawrence, 2015;McGinley et al, 2012;Tang et al, 2017;Podlinyayev et al, 2019;Pokrovsky & Polischuk, 2016;Romm, 2017;Shisharina, 2018;Shisharina et al, 2019;Stepanova & Aleksandrova, 2017;Van Leerdam, 2017). These works represent the parameters of the intensity of academic work: intellectual, sensory, emotional stress, the degree of monotonicity of the loads, the mode of studying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Y. Milushkin, N. A. Skoblin, C. Meilstrup, L. Nielsen, M. Edraki, N. Parvizi, S. Montaseri, S. Pourahmad, are often narrowly targeted, of disciplinary nature, most often from the standpoint of medical hygiene (Kuchma et al, 2014(Kuchma et al, , 2019 without other aspects of safety evaluation of innovative tools used in the educational process (Eggermont, 2017;Genc, 2014;Ivantsova et al, 2018;Kluppels et al, 2017;Lai et al, 2015;Lawrence, 2015;McGinley et al, 2012;Tang et al, 2017;Podlinyayev et al, 2019;Pokrovsky & Polischuk, 2016;Romm, 2017;Shisharina, 2018;Shisharina et al, 2019;Stepanova & Aleksandrova, 2017;Van Leerdam, 2017). These works represent the parameters of the intensity of academic work: intellectual, sensory, emotional stress, the degree of monotonicity of the loads, the mode of studying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%