2016
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2016.189
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Methods in Healthcare Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Stewardship: Use of Administrative and Surveillance Databases

Abstract: Administrative and surveillance data are used frequently in healthcare epidemiology and antimicrobial stewardship (HE&AS) research because of their wide availability and efficiency. However, data quality issues exist, requiring careful consideration and potential validation of data. This methods paper presents key considerations for using administrative and surveillance data in HE&AS, including types of data available and potential use, data limitations, and the importance of validation. After discussing these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(114 reference statements)
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, to control the spread of MRSA, it is advised that both antibiotic use regulation and contact preventions be strictly observed. Similarly, culture surveillance is an important control measure (Farr, 2004;Drees et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to control the spread of MRSA, it is advised that both antibiotic use regulation and contact preventions be strictly observed. Similarly, culture surveillance is an important control measure (Farr, 2004;Drees et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations of using diagnostic codes in administrative data to identify infected cases have been highlighted previously. [32][33][34][35] Also, our results are specific to Nova Scotia and may not reflect other jurisdictions. Finally, we did not distinguish between superficial and deep infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Our cohort of cases was identified using ICD‐10‐AM codes and the ED or the admitting medical team's documented clinical impression. Coding relies on good clinical documentation and is therefore prone to insensitivity and non‐specificity . Acknowledging the potential influence of coding, we chose to include a broad range of ICD‐10‐AM codes associated with pneumonia and confirmed these as relevant cases only after review of medical records and agreement between the two independent reviewers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%