2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on a multi-objective hierarchical prediction energy management strategy for range extended fuel cell vehicles

Abstract: In this paper, a multi-objective hierarchical prediction energy management strategy is proposed to achieve optimal fuel cell life economy and energy consumption economy for a range extended fuel cell vehicle.First, a global state of charge rapid planning method is proposed based only on the expected driving distance.Then, the vehicle speed information in the prediction horizon is estimated by a vehicle speed prediction module based on the back propagation neural network. According to the predicted speed and st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, under 7 kW load, the fuel economy obtained is still high, being of about 8% (=100•12.16/152.3) and 9% (=100•14.46/150) using the Air-LFW and Fuel-LFW strategies. The experimental and simulation studies [69][70][71] validate the aforementioned fuel savings by comparison with a baseline strategy, reporting a fuel economy in the same range, as follows: a fuel economy of 12.36% (=100•(4.47−3.9782)/3.9782) using a hierarchical energy management strategy [69]; a lower fuel economy of 6.25% (=100•(64.91−61.09)/61.09) using a Kriging-based bi-objective constrained optimization strategy as reported in [70]; a fuel economy of 8.6% and 13.5% compared with those based on the charge-depletion-charge-sustaining strategy and equivalent consumption minimization strategy have been reported for a multi-objective hierarchical prediction energy management strategy [71] when the drive cycle is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, under 7 kW load, the fuel economy obtained is still high, being of about 8% (=100•12.16/152.3) and 9% (=100•14.46/150) using the Air-LFW and Fuel-LFW strategies. The experimental and simulation studies [69][70][71] validate the aforementioned fuel savings by comparison with a baseline strategy, reporting a fuel economy in the same range, as follows: a fuel economy of 12.36% (=100•(4.47−3.9782)/3.9782) using a hierarchical energy management strategy [69]; a lower fuel economy of 6.25% (=100•(64.91−61.09)/61.09) using a Kriging-based bi-objective constrained optimization strategy as reported in [70]; a fuel economy of 8.6% and 13.5% compared with those based on the charge-depletion-charge-sustaining strategy and equivalent consumption minimization strategy have been reported for a multi-objective hierarchical prediction energy management strategy [71] when the drive cycle is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is urgent to develop alternative fuels and energy-save technology [11][12][13][14][15]. Thus, the automotive makers and researchers have made great effort to explore efficient and sustainable solutions, most of which are focused on vehicle hybridization/electrification [16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameter optimization of PHEVs is related to the energy management strategy, and energy management strategies need to be developed before parameter optimization. At present, the research on the energy management strategy for PHEVs mainly focuses on the development of the advanced optimization algorithm, such as the algorithm based on the minimum equivalent fuel consumption [26][27][28][29], the dynamic programming algorithm [30][31][32], stochastic dynamic programming [33], the algorithm based on convex optimization [2,34] and the model predictive control algorithm [35][36][37][38]. Although the above-mentioned optimization algorithm can obtain the local or global optimum, it is difficult to apply to real vehicle control for hardly knowing the driving cycles beforehand or the large amount of calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%