Research on effects of integration of primary, secondary, and tertiary industries in rural areas of developing countries: an approach of rural capital subsidies

Li, Xiaochun; Li, Min; Wu, Yunyun

doi:10.1080/16081625.2023.2194893

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…RIID plays a crucial role in addressing agricultural development challenges, revitalizing the rural economy [37], and promoting balanced urban-rural development [38]. Agricultural growth can drive the development of the secondary and tertiary sectors, while the demand increase that sustains agricultural growth is spurred by the expansion of these other sectors [39].…”

Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Foundationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unveiling the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Driving Mechanism of Rural Industrial Integration Development: A Case of Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle, China

Shen,

Sargani,

Wang

et al. 2024

Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

China’s urban–rural dichotomy has resulted in a widening gap between urban and rural areas, posing significant challenges to rural development. This study aims to investigate the spatio-temporal differentiation and driving mechanisms of rural industry integration within the Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle in China. Using panel data from 2011 to 2020, we employed the entropy weight TOPSIS method to construct a comprehensive index that charts the evolution of rural industry integration across various districts and counties. Additionally, we utilized fixed-effect and spatio-temporally weighted regression models to analyze the underlying driving forces behind this integration. Our findings reveal a dynamic and varied landscape of rural industry integration, with different levels of depth and breadth across various subsystems. Spatially, we observed a transition from a dispersed to a more concentrated agglomeration pattern within the Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle. This shift suggests a diffusion effect emanating from core metropolitan areas, as well as an attracting force exerted by adjacent metropolitan circles. In terms of drivers, market demand, openness level, financial development, policy support, and agricultural insurance breadth significantly contribute to rural industry integration. However, technological progress and rural human capital exhibit a weaker correlation. Notably, our models identified pronounced spatial–temporal heterogeneity among these influencing factors, highlighting a nuanced and dynamic relationship between them. Overall, our study emphasizes the crucial role of rural industry integration in bridging the urban–rural divide and fostering sustainable agricultural development and rural revitalization. The insights gained from this research provide valuable guidance for policymakers and stakeholders seeking to optimize rural development strategies and unlock the potential of integrated rural industries.

show abstract

Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Foundationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unveiling the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Driving Mechanism of Rural Industrial Integration Development: A Case of Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle, China

Shen,

Sargani,

Wang

et al. 2024

Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…By carrying out cultural tourism, it empowers the development of scenic areas and creates an "ethnic cultural tourism-driven" development model, promoting the transformation of cultural value into economic value. From perspective of the "rural society ecosystem", the Shanmu River Scenic Area reconstructs the production-living-ecological spaces of the scenic area and countryside; optimizes the living space pattern; strengthens the deep integration of primary, secondary, and tertiary industries; improves the output efficiency of production space; and ultimately achieves the organic integration of mountains, water, forests, fields, and villages [50], thus promoting the harmonious development of productionliving-ecological spaces. The Huangguoshu Scenic Area integrates the development of the forestry and fruit industry with scenic tourism, fully leveraging its resource and industrial advantages, promoting tourism through forestry and fruit, and promoting forestry and fruit through tourism.…”

Section: "Staggered Development" Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecosystem Services Value Realization and Ecological Industry Design in Scenic Areas of Karst in South China

Chang,

Xiong,

Zhu

et al. 2024

Forests

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ecosystem services (ESs) value realization and ecological industry (eco-industry) are essential components of regional development. Due to the vulnerability and non-renewability of natural landscape resources in Karst areas, once unreasonable resource development takes place, it is easy to pose threats and causes damage to its ecosystem. This article selects the grain data correction equivalent factor coefficients in Guizhou Province, China, and establishes accounting indicators for Karst scenic areas. It is found that the total economic value of ESs is as follows: Shanmuhe Scenic Area (CNY 5096.3 thousand) > DaXiaoQiKong Scenic Area (CNY 2778.6 thousand) > Huangguoshu Scenic Area (CNY 2130.7 thousand). Among them, the value of regulating services plays a dominant role in the composition of ESs, and the value of forests accounts for the largest proportion. Through web crawlers, tourism data can be acquired, and the Product–Experience–Feedback–Improvement (PEFI) model can be applied to reveal that tourists have a predominantly positive perception of Karst scenic areas. This indicates that karst landscape resources are deeply loved by domestic and foreign tourists, especially mountain, water and forest landscapes. Based on the results of the ES value accounting of the scenic area and the external perception data of tourists towards the scenic area, the eco-industry spatial layout development plan is formulated. According to local conditions, the development, construction, and protection of the scenic area are carried out, jointly promoting the realization of the ecological product value (EPV) of the Karst scenic area, to determine the optimal development direction of the eco-industry, and to promote the coordinated development of ecological resources and assets.

show abstract

“…Additionally, it is important to leverage the radiating influence of core cities and enhance the feedback capacity of rural areas [23]. Urban-rural efforts should focus on both fronts: using urban organizational systems as breakthrough points [24], improving rural transportation infrastructure [25], accelerating the urbanization of rural residents, enhancing the quality of rural life, promoting rural revitalization [26], and fostering effective integration of primary, secondary, and tertiary industries in urban and rural areas [27]. However, the most crucial aspect is to construct a people-centered social security system [28], allowing rural populations to develop a sense of belonging and identity in urban areas.…”

Section: Influencing Factors and Driving Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on Sustainable Urban–Rural Integration Development: Measuring Levels, Influencing Factors, and Exploring Driving Mechanisms—Taking Eight Cities in the Greater Bay Area as Examples

Xu,

Zeng,

et al. 2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urban–rural integration is a top priority in social development and an urgent requirement for vigorously promoting rural revitalization. However, the current development of urban–rural integration in China still faces issues such as an unreasonable urban–rural industrial structure, unidirectional flow of rural population, and low sense of belonging among rural residents. Based on this, this paper selects eight cities from the Greater Bay Area as examples, organizing urban–rural integration development data from 1986 to 2022. It employs principal component analysis to quantitatively evaluate the evolutionary trend of urban–rural integration, constructs a fixed-effect panel quantile regression model to explore the factors influencing urban–rural integration and its spatiotemporal evolution, and uses threshold effects and interaction effects to test the threshold and application requirements for maximizing the benefits of urban–rural integration driving mechanisms, drawing empirical insights from comparisons with other bay areas around the world. The research found the following: First, between 1986 and 2022, the development of urban–rural integration in the Greater Bay Area steadily progressed, with gradually emerging effects, and industrial integration and population integration made significant contributions to the development of urban–rural integration. Second, the driving mechanisms of market economics, government intervention, and social fusion significantly impact urban–rural integration, with the influence of market economics being the most significant. Third, the impacts of the three driving mechanisms on urban–rural integration show temporal and spatial differences. In terms of time, market economics and government intervention always have a positive impact, while social fusion shows a “suppressing-promoting” trend, with a lower impact coefficient. Spatially, there are differences in strategies and priorities for promoting urban–rural integration in each region. Fourth, all three driving mechanisms exhibit threshold effects, and the explanatory power of any two interacting driving mechanisms for urban–rural integration development is stronger than that of any single mechanism. Notably, the combined interaction effect of the three driving mechanisms has the highest impact coefficient. The driving mechanisms should be implemented according to the principles of “synchronization, heterogeneity, and categorization”.

show abstract

Research on effects of integration of primary, secondary, and tertiary industries in rural areas of developing countries: an approach of rural capital subsidies

Cited by 8 publications

References 29 publications

Unveiling the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Driving Mechanism of Rural Industrial Integration Development: A Case of Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle, China

Unveiling the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Driving Mechanism of Rural Industrial Integration Development: A Case of Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle, China

Ecosystem Services Value Realization and Ecological Industry Design in Scenic Areas of Karst in South China

Research on Sustainable Urban–Rural Integration Development: Measuring Levels, Influencing Factors, and Exploring Driving Mechanisms—Taking Eight Cities in the Greater Bay Area as Examples

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About