Research on Fiscal Expenditure Structure and High-Quality Economic Development: An Empirical Study Based on Panel Data from Chinese Provinces from 2007 to 2017

Liu, Yaying

doi:10.4236/ajibm.2020.102015

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From the perspective of fiscal policy, different scholars possess different views. First, the study argues that fiscal decentralization helps improve the efficiency of local government resource allocation and GDP growth rate [33], Active fiscal policy can effectively improve the quality and efficiency of economic growth [34][35][36][37]. Second, the study concludes that there are different effects of different aspects of fiscal spending on high-quality economic development [38][39][40].…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

An empirical analysis of the impact of Chinese government investment on high-quality economic development——A study based on spatial Dubin model

Wang

Liu²

2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

China’s economy has shifted from the stage of high-speed growth to the stage of high-quality development. This paper selects panel data of 30 provinces, municipalities directly under the Central Government and autonomous regions (except Tibet) in mainland China with the time dimension of 2006–2016, selects indicators from five dimensions of innovation, coordination, greenness, openness and sharing, uses principal component analysis to construct a system of indicators of high-quality economic development, and uses the spatial Durbin model to empirically the impact of government investment behavior in the three industries on the regional economic high-quality development was studied. The results show that: first, there is a significant positive spatial correlation between China’s economic quality development. Second, government investment in different industries has different effects on the quality development of the economy. Investment in the tertiary industry can boost employment, raise income level, promote economic quality development, and enhance sharing, coordination and innovation; investment in the secondary industry can enhance innovation, but because of the "crowding-out effect", it will reduce openness and sharing, and is not conducive to promoting economic quality development; investment in the primary industry can Investment in the primary industry can significantly improve coordination, but it will reduce innovation, greenness, openness and sharing, which will also have a negative impact on the overall high-quality economic development. Third, there is a significant spatial spillover effect of government investment behavior on regional economic quality development, and the economic quality development of this region will have an impact on neighboring regions. Finally, based on the research results, this paper puts forward countermeasure suggestions for promoting high-quality economic development.

show abstract

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

An empirical analysis of the impact of Chinese government investment on high-quality economic development——A study based on spatial Dubin model

Wang

Liu²

2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Analyses of OECD countries suggest that there is a positive relationship between FD and healthcare efficiency (Arends, 2017;Sow & Razafimahefa, 2015), but in emerging economies and developing countries FD may have a negative relationship with healthcare efficiency, potentially due to corruption (Sow & Razafimahefa, 2015). In the Chinese context, Lu and Tian (2013) and Liu (2018) find a positive relationship between FD from the central to the provincial government and healthcare efficiency for 2003-2010 and 2009-2015 (though see Gong & Lu, 2013), which may point to the efficacy of administrative decentralization in the absence of political decentralization. However, to date, research has not addressed the impact of decentralization from provincial to sub-provincial governments on healthcare efficiency, even though responsibility for healthcare is widely decentralized within provinces (Shen et al, 2012).…”

Section: In Addition To Sorting Mechanisms Potentially Informing Chinesementioning

confidence: 99%

Intra‐provincial fiscal decentralization, relative wealth, and healthcare efficiency: Empirical evidence from China

Sun

Andrews

2022

Public Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decentralizing fiscal power to locally elected governments is often regarded as beneficial for public service efficiency. However, questions remain about whether decentralizing fiscal responsibilities work well in countries lacking political decentralization. In China, fiscal decentralization has significantly strengthened the role of local governments in the provision of healthcare services, but evidence of its efficiency effects is scarce. To cast light on this issue, this study investigates the relationship between intra‐provincial fiscal decentralization and the productive efficiency of healthcare services in China. Analysis of panel data for 2006–2017 suggests that expenditure and revenue decentralization from provincial to sub‐provincial governments significantly improves healthcare efficiency. Further analysis suggests that the positive impact of healthcare expenditure decentralization on healthcare efficiency may be stronger in wealthier provinces. These findings have important theoretical and practical implications.

show abstract

“…The other is to construct a multidimensional comprehensive evaluation index system, which reveal the dynamic, complex and comprehensive characteristics of HQED. Thus, establishing a multidimensional evaluation index system has become one of the most mainstream methods [14,[20][21][22][23][24][25]. In Chinese context, the connotation of HQED is different from that of traditional quality of economic growth and more abundant.…”

Section: Measurement Of High-quality Economic Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Step 1: Establish the evaluation matrix of HQED. [22,25] Negative B11:Industrial waste water discharge [22,24] Negative B12:Green coverage rate of built-up area [22,24] Positive Set the original evaluation matrix of HQED in YRD:…”

Section: Dependent Variables (1) Quantity Of Economic Growth (Pergdp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the Impact of Technology Innovation on Quantity and Quality of Economic Growth in the Yangtze River Delta of China: A Comparative Study

Cao¹,

Ge²

2021

IJSDP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

High-quality economic development (HQED) has recently become a crucial sustainable growth mode in China, which pursues economic growth while maintaining social equity and green ecology. The HQED of the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) has played an exemplary role in achieving the leap from “China speed” to “China Quality”. In this paper, we first use the entropy-weight multidimensional comprehensive evaluation method to calculate the HQED index as a proxy for the quality of economic growth. Then, using panel data of 41 cities in the YRD, we conduct a comparative study to examine impacts of technological innovation (TI) on quantity and quality of economic growth by employing different panel estimation models over the period 2009-2019 and check the robustness in five ways. Finally, this paper investigates the TI-economic growth link based on the panel quantile regression across the conditional distributions of economic growth levels. Results show that TI has significantly positive effects in terms of both quantity and quality of economic growth, and the promoting effect on the quantity of economic growth is almost four times higher than that of quality under mean estimations by double fixed-effects. The effect on quantity of economic growth is also stronger than that of quality under the conditional distribution, and TI has a stronger impact for regions with higher levels of economic growth.

show abstract

Research on Fiscal Expenditure Structure and High-Quality Economic Development: An Empirical Study Based on Panel Data from Chinese Provinces from 2007 to 2017

Cited by 6 publications

References 3 publications

An empirical analysis of the impact of Chinese government investment on high-quality economic development——A study based on spatial Dubin model

An empirical analysis of the impact of Chinese government investment on high-quality economic development——A study based on spatial Dubin model

Intra‐provincial fiscal decentralization, relative wealth, and healthcare efficiency: Empirical evidence from China

Research on the Impact of Technology Innovation on Quantity and Quality of Economic Growth in the Yangtze River Delta of China: A Comparative Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About