2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.09.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on how the difference of personal propagation ability influences the epidemic spreading in activity-driven network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The currently propagation theory of complex network mainly focuses on the global level. Most scholars have studied the problem of propagation in the actual scenario [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. To sum up, the current literature research mainly focuses on global level propagation, which can be classified as global propagation model, because of taking into account global, statistical and structural factors of complex network.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The currently propagation theory of complex network mainly focuses on the global level. Most scholars have studied the problem of propagation in the actual scenario [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. To sum up, the current literature research mainly focuses on global level propagation, which can be classified as global propagation model, because of taking into account global, statistical and structural factors of complex network.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars have proposed improvements and optimizations to the time-varying network model, to make it more in line with the real network and dynamic characteristics, and mainly applied it to the epidemic transmission and the information transmission in social networks [21]. Some scholars set properties for nodes, such as attractiveness and willingness [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] or introduced external factor to the process of propagation [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%