2019
DOI: 10.1080/08916152.2019.1570985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on the air-side thermal hydraulic performance of louvered fin and flat tube heat exchangers under low-pressure environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A model of louvered fin in ref. [4a] is established and meshed, and the number of mesh varies from 100 000 to 1.3 million. The difference between results of 900 000 grid and 550 000 grid is less than 1%, considering the calculation accuracy and cost, 550 000 grids can meet the current research.…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A model of louvered fin in ref. [4a] is established and meshed, and the number of mesh varies from 100 000 to 1.3 million. The difference between results of 900 000 grid and 550 000 grid is less than 1%, considering the calculation accuracy and cost, 550 000 grids can meet the current research.…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of the air side j and f factors of the louvered fins is based on the correlation obtained by Wan et al. [ 4a ] j=0.856Re0.472()Lα900.0301()FpLp0.375()FhLp0.775×()LhLp0.599()LdLp0.0346()pp00.0607\begin{align}j& = 0.856{{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} ^{ - 0.472}}{\left( {\frac{{{L_{{\alpha}}}}}{{90}}} \right)^{0.0301}}{\left( {\frac{{{F_{\rm{p}}}}}{{{L_{\rm{p}}}}}} \right)^{0.375}}{\left( {\frac{{{F_{\rm{h}}}}}{{{L_{\rm{p}}}}}} \right)^{ - 0.775}}\nonumber\\ &\times{\left( {\frac{{{L_{\rm{h}}}}}{{{L_{\rm{p}}}}}} \right)^{0.599}}{\left( {\frac{{{L_{\rm{d}}}}}{{{L_{\rm{p}}}}}} \right)^{ - 0.0346}}{\left( {\frac{p}{{{p_0}}}} \right)^{0.0607}}\end{align} f=0.711Re0.442()Lα900.864()FpLp0.262()FhLp0.7()LhLp0.308×()LdLp0.478()pp00.438\begin{align}f &= 0.711{{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} ^{ - 0.442}}{\left( {\frac{{{L_{{\alpha}}}}}{{90}}} \right)^{0.864}}{\left( {\frac{{{F_{\rm{p}}}}}{{{L_{\rm{p}}}}}} \right)^{ - 0.262}}{\left( {\frac{{{F_{\rm{h}}}}}{{{L_{\rm{p}}}}}} \right)^{0.7}}{\left( {\frac{{{L_{\rm{h}}}}}{{{L_{\rm{p}}}}}} \right)^{ - 0.308}}\nonumber\\ &\times{\left( {\frac{{{L_{\rm{d}}}}}{{{L_{\rm{p}}}}}} \right)^{0.478}}{\left( {\frac{p}{{{p_0}}}} \right)^{ - 0.438}}\end{align}…”
Section: Mathematical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pressure drops of the two heat transfer units were measured with a U-tube manometer. The equal power heating method described in [24] was adopted to heat the hot water bath to reduce the heat balance and experiment time. The water pipe, test channel and test unit were wrapped with 10 mm heat insulation materials for insulation.…”
Section: Wind Tunnel Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the large thermal resistance of FTHEs is yielded by the air-side due to the thermo-physical property of air [6,7]. The energy efficiency on the gas side of the independent FTHEs may be increased by changing the tube and fin shapes [8][9][10][11][12]. Furthermore, the fluid recirculation in the thermally dead zones and the pressure drop due to the drag force are widely affected by the tube shape [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%