Icsssm11 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icsssm.2011.5959300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on the evaluation system of service enterprise competitiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to China's "National Economic Industry Classification and Code 2022" standard, as well as the role and main business of each company, the companies involved in the third-party sector are divided into two categories: (Guo, 2009;Song and Chuchun, 2011;Guo, 2018).…”
Section: Enterprisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to China's "National Economic Industry Classification and Code 2022" standard, as well as the role and main business of each company, the companies involved in the third-party sector are divided into two categories: (Guo, 2009;Song and Chuchun, 2011;Guo, 2018).…”
Section: Enterprisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we assume that the averaging model, MSE-weighted model, or optimization model is the objective model and record its evaluation result as the reference r = ½r 1 , r 2, ⋯ , r m . Calculate the correlation coefficient c k between the result of the kth single evaluation model and the reference [65], then the drift is p k = 1 − c k , and the weight is as follows:…”
Section: Drift Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 5: Use spearman correlation coefficient method [25] to test the consistency of the independent evaluation results in step 2 and the combined evaluation results in step 4. Choose the results of the highest consistency as the final evaluation results of command and control capability.…”
Section: ) Capacity Assessment Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then three combinatorial evaluation models (arithmetic average combination evaluation model [25], Copeland combination evaluation model [23], and drift degree combination evaluation model [25], [26]) are used to evaluate the samples respectively. The results are shown in TABLE 3.…”
Section: Rule6mentioning
confidence: 99%