2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although working with high school students, Chance et al (2004) and Saldanha and Thompson (2002) recommend having learners repeat the sampling process and compare multiple sample results to foster an understanding of the sample process. Other recommendations for the design of the intervention would be to take an approach that integrates CK and PCK (Groth, 2017), have learners conduct statistical investigations themselves (Garfield & Ben-Zvi, 2008), use hands-on activities (Canada, 2006;Pratt & Kazak, 2018), use simulation activities to illustrate sampling variability (Garfield & Ben-Zvi, 2008;Mills, 2002) and keep descriptive analyses as simple as possible to facilitate focusing on the relevant concepts to be learned (Arnold, Pfannkuch, Wild, Regan, & Budgett, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although working with high school students, Chance et al (2004) and Saldanha and Thompson (2002) recommend having learners repeat the sampling process and compare multiple sample results to foster an understanding of the sample process. Other recommendations for the design of the intervention would be to take an approach that integrates CK and PCK (Groth, 2017), have learners conduct statistical investigations themselves (Garfield & Ben-Zvi, 2008), use hands-on activities (Canada, 2006;Pratt & Kazak, 2018), use simulation activities to illustrate sampling variability (Garfield & Ben-Zvi, 2008;Mills, 2002) and keep descriptive analyses as simple as possible to facilitate focusing on the relevant concepts to be learned (Arnold, Pfannkuch, Wild, Regan, & Budgett, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the media, this perspective of mathematics provides credibility for propositions and arguments in a seemingly unbiased fashion (Himmelstein, 2014 ). Similarly, in typical mathematics and statistics curricula, students learn that levels of probability associated with the occurrence of events are always quantifiable, that is, the chance of uncertain events can be accurately calculated and represented numerically (Pratt & Kazak, 2018 ). The uses of StaMPs in media items about the pandemic, however, often involve notions of vagueness and risk .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, type m respondents thought that random events are naturally equiprobable, even when they are not (Lecoutre, 1992). This is perhaps related to the representativeness heuristic: it denotes judging the likelihood of an event according to how well such event represents some aspects of the parent population or how it matches the system that generated it, which is the case of m thinkers (Kustos & Zelkowski, 2013;Pratt & Kazak, 2018). They focused on the random process, which appeared clearly in their description: 'both situations imply random experiments, and [the] outcomes have the same chance to occur, regardless of any conditions'.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Mathematically Oriented Thinkers [M = M and M* Reasoning]mentioning
confidence: 99%