Research productivity of the finance profession in the Asia-Pacific region

Chan, Kam C.; Chen, Carl R.; Steiner, Thomas L.

doi:10.1016/s0927-538x(01)00011-7

Cited by 32 publications

(67 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Kobe University is ranked 18th when the top-5 journals are used for ranking. This finding is very similar to Chan, Chen, and Steiner's (2001) in the area of finance. This finding, however, is quite different from who study the ranking for the discipline of economics.…”

Section: Rankings Based Upon the Whole Sample Period From 1991 To 2002supporting

confidence: 85%

“…Hence, not only we are able to examine a university's research performance, we are able to study how well it improves in research productivity over the twelve-year period. While there are similar studies in economics and finance (Chan, Chen and Steiner, 2001), no comparable study is available to provide similar information on the progress of the research productivity in accounting in the Asia-Pacific region. 3 Our study thus fills this void.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Ranking Research Productivity in Accounting for Asia-Pacific Universities

Chan

Chen

Cheng

2005

Rev Quant Finan Acc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using a set of 18 accounting journals and a sub-set of top five journals from 1991 to 2002, we rank the research productivity in accounting for a total of 119 Asia-Pacific universities. For the whole sampling period, the top five universities are the University of New South Wales, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Nanyang Technological University, the University of Sydney, and City University of Hong Kong. A number of prominent universities with long school history are not ranked in the top 20. During the second half of the sampling period, Hong Kong and Singaporean universities have shown the most improvement while some Australian universities have exhibited decline in research output. Also, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology replaces University of New South Wales as the first-ranked university in the period of 1997–2002. When compared with other North American universities, the accounting productivity of the top 20 Asia-Pacific institutions is comparable with that of leading universities in North America. The comparison is even more favorable to the Asia-Pacific universities during the period of 1997–2002. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005research, accounting, ranking of Asia-Pacific universities,

show abstract

Section: Rankings Based Upon the Whole Sample Period From 1991 To 2002supporting

confidence: 85%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ranking Research Productivity in Accounting for Asia-Pacific Universities

Chan

Chen

Cheng

2005

Rev Quant Finan Acc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Evidence indicates that academic institutions in both regions have demonstrated tremendous growth and improvement, which is likely due to the growing interest and awareness of the relevance in ethical business decisions. These ranking studies include Jin and Yau (1999) in Asian economics; Kalaitzidakis et al (1999) in European economics; Cheng et al (2003) in Asian marketing; Chan et al (2004) in European finance; in Asian finance; and Carmona et al (1999) and Chan et al (2006) in European accounting.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Business Ethics Research: A Global Perspective

2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the present study, we follow the approach by Young et al (1996) and measure research output of an individual researcher using a 'distributed' measure (author articles) and a 'shared' measure (full articles). This approach has also been used in other research studies (Chan, Chen and Steiner 2004;Chan, Fung, and Leung 2006;Kumar and Kundu 2004). In addition, this paper will assess the patterns of authorship and the degree of collaboration between authors, institutions and countries that have published in IJPR.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%