2016
DOI: 10.1590/1982-027520160001000010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Researcher experience as an instrument of investigation of a phenomenon: An example of heuristic research

Abstract: Heuristic investigation, one of the lesser-known qualitative research methods in Brazil, is presented as a phenomenological research design in an empirical study investigating the experience of singing. This article describes the six phases of the heuristic method: initial engagement, immersion, incubation, illumination, explication, and creative synthesis. The method was developed by Clark Moustakas (1923-2012), an American clinical psychologist who, together with other renowned scholars such as Carl R. Roger… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Wilson (2015) advised that participants in a phenomenological study should be fascinated in and committed to investigating their lived experiences. Similarly, Brisola and Cury (2016) commented that in phenomenological research, the participant selection is very important because the participants are few in number (ranging from 10 to 15 participants). The authors also proposed that the participants should have an individual experience of the phenomenon and be enthusiastic about taking part in interviews with the inquirer in a way that allows an encounter between them, not simply a collection of data or exchange of information.…”
Section: Participant Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wilson (2015) advised that participants in a phenomenological study should be fascinated in and committed to investigating their lived experiences. Similarly, Brisola and Cury (2016) commented that in phenomenological research, the participant selection is very important because the participants are few in number (ranging from 10 to 15 participants). The authors also proposed that the participants should have an individual experience of the phenomenon and be enthusiastic about taking part in interviews with the inquirer in a way that allows an encounter between them, not simply a collection of data or exchange of information.…”
Section: Participant Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Themes emerged during the analysis and were informed by the researchers' subjective experiences of the remote WFH mode through process explication (Conklin, 2007). In process explication, "researchers attend to their awareness, feelings, thoughts, beliefs, and judgments as a prelude to the understanding that is derived from conversations and dialogues with others" (Brisola and Cury, 2016). Constant comparisons between the transcripts and the emerging system of themes and sub-themes were engaged, and the repeated re-description of the various aspects of each theme was performed until it appeared that no further changes could improve the consistency and accuracy of the analysis, signalling that the point of theoretical saturation had been reached (Strauss and Corbin, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pesquisa foi desenvolvida por meio do método fenomenológico no qual o pesquisador propõe-se a ir a campo em busca de uma oportunidade para compreender o fenômeno de interesse, da forma como ele se dá na realidade concreta, desenvolvendo-se num processo que se inicia pelos significados de uma dada experiência para as pessoas e segue com as interpretações do pesquisador acerca dos elementos que constituem a complexidade do fenômeno (Ales Bello, 2004;Brisola & Cury, 2016). O objetivo do estudo consistiu em compreender a experiência de pacientes que são assistidos por um SAD ligado ao SUS em um município do Estado de São Paulo.…”
Section: Métodounclassified