The purpose of this paper is to investigate the educational qualifications and experience of executive and non-executive members of directorial boards in Australia. Inspired by Galbraith's (1967) analysis of the ‗technostructure', we examine the educational qualifications of managerial (executive) directors and non-executive directors to assess the extent of divergences in the relevance (to the company's operations) of executives' and non-executives' educational qualifications. In addition, we measure the ‗relatedness' of executives' and non-executives' educational qualifications to determine the extent to which the set of educational qualifications of executive directors diverges from that of non-executive directors. We find significant differences in the relevance of the educational qualifications possessed by executives and non-executives. We also find very low relatedness between the two sets of educational qualifications. The advantages of board diversity on the one hand and the disadvantages that may attend potentially sub-optimal technical information flow on the other are discussed.
3The purpose of this paper is to present the results of an investigation into the educational qualifications (and experience) of Australian managers and the educational qualifications of Australian non-executive directors (members of boards). In particular, the investigation is focussed on the possession of educational qualifications and experience that are relevant to the technical information generated by particular types of business enterprise and the differences in such qualifications and experience that characterise managers, especially chief executive officers and managing directors, from those that characterise non-executive members of the board. The differences in qualifications are assessed and the ‗relatedness' of the set of executive qualifications and the set of non-executive qualifications is measured. Any differences between managers and non-executives in this regard is potentially important since the ability to seek and interpret appropriate information is essential for the efficient operation of the modern corporation and the effective control or guidance of CEOs by boards of directors. Prior literature indicates that one of the key antecedents of nonexecutive directors' effectiveness is their level of knowledge and skills (Carter and Lorsch, 2004;Charan, 1998, Hendry, 2005. Indeed the management literature indicates that to be effective, nonexecutive directors should have both functional and firm-specific knowledge and skills (Carter and Lorsch, 2004, Charan, 1998). The optimality of the interaction between CEO and board may be subject to some diminution if the board of directors does not seek or is unable to effectively interpret and utilise the technical information provided to them by the CEO (even if the information is full and complete). Our results are relevant both to those studies that highlight the importance of board diversity and those that are concerned with the optimal flow of informati...