Boards at Work 2002
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199258161.003.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Researching Boards of Directors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Mace (1971) is based on interviews with executives and directors of American companies. Lorsch and MacIver (1989), basing themselves on interviews held with directors of American companies in the second half of the 1980s, and Stiles and Taylor (2001), using interviews with directors of British companies conducted in the late 1990s, report findings that are by and large consistent with those of Mace (1971). 5 Directors refers to outside directors.…”
Section: Mace (1971) Provides a Classic Account Of What The Relationsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…4 Mace (1971) is based on interviews with executives and directors of American companies. Lorsch and MacIver (1989), basing themselves on interviews held with directors of American companies in the second half of the 1980s, and Stiles and Taylor (2001), using interviews with directors of British companies conducted in the late 1990s, report findings that are by and large consistent with those of Mace (1971). 5 Directors refers to outside directors.…”
Section: Mace (1971) Provides a Classic Account Of What The Relationsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The board of directors is one of the mechanisms for controlling and advising management and ensuring that decisions are made in accordance with shareholders' interests. (Stiles and Taylor, 2001) The separation of ownership and control, the documentation of which is attributed to Adolf Berle and Gardiner Means (Berle andMeans 1930 and1933;Means 1931), represents the cornerstone of modern inquiry into the governance of corporations. Berle and Means highlighted both the concentration of wealth within corporations and the dispersal of ownership among a multitude of small investors, each of whom had little power to compel a board of directors to control the corporation's officers.…”
Section: The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boards of directors constitute a resource on which managers may call for advice (Huse, 2005). Boards participate in the strategic decision-making process, support executive management in defining the strategic context of the firm, and provide external legitimacy and networking (Stiles and Taylor, 2001). At the strategic level, non-executive directors may be called on to participate in activities such as evaluating and selecting strategic alternatives that have been developed by senior managers, and providing advice to improve the quality of strategic decisions (Huse, 2005;Styles and Taylor, 2001).…”
Section: The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From conversations and public statements of individual directors we've seen emerge several theories that describe how boards operate and seek to prescribe the basis on which directors should make decisions. Stiles and Taylor (2001) outline six theories of corporate governance, though perhaps only three have a useful normative character. First, the legal view is a narrow one, which re¯ects what some directors might see as their role ± ful®lling the obligations of company law ± but which provides little worthwhile guidance for their actions.…”
Section: Theories Of Corporate Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agency theory helps the director in ®nding solutions to the narrow problems of corporate governance: how to keep managers from diverting corporate funds for private purposes. Quali®ed by reference to transaction-cost economics, as in the organisational economics theory as outlined by Stiles and Taylor (2001), it can even help directors decide when its no longer worth trying to prevent managers from stealing shareholder funds, indeed why it might help shareholders to encourage what the British media like to call fat-cat pay. It was, after all, all those very fat-American-cat CEOs who delivered the disproportionately large gains in pro®ts, share price appreciation and productivity while taking home large sums of cash pay and huge, unrealised gains on stock options.…”
Section: Toward a New Ethical Stance In Governancementioning
confidence: 99%