2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315630618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Researching Gender, Violence and Abuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjectivity is the focus of doing autoethnography and yet one does not lose sight of social and cultural contexts, which is in line with the symbolic interactionist paradigm. Autoethnography sheds light on power and gender relations that unravel in such contexts, especially in respect of experiences of gender‐based violence (Westmarland and Bows ). It requires one to pay attention, then, to micro‐level social relations, how they come about, while alluding to macro‐level social structures that shape how a micro‐level social encounter takes place.…”
Section: Methodological Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjectivity is the focus of doing autoethnography and yet one does not lose sight of social and cultural contexts, which is in line with the symbolic interactionist paradigm. Autoethnography sheds light on power and gender relations that unravel in such contexts, especially in respect of experiences of gender‐based violence (Westmarland and Bows ). It requires one to pay attention, then, to micro‐level social relations, how they come about, while alluding to macro‐level social structures that shape how a micro‐level social encounter takes place.…”
Section: Methodological Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such print material included training manuals, monthly newsletters, annual reports, and newspaper articles. Feminist scholarship has cited this type of mixed-method research as an advantage to the breadth of data collection, allowing for a view of institutional processes that cannot be ascertained by interviews alone (Westmarland & Bows, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trauma affects sexual violence researchers in differing and unpredictable ways, including feeling guilty, angry, stigmatized, emotional, fearful, sad and unhappy (Coles et al., 2014). Westmarland and Bows (2019) argue that for researchers who immerse themselves in sexual violence research, it can become difficult, both emotionally and spiritually; for example, it can be emotional, traumatic and upsetting to get close to your data since they can trigger prior experiences of hurt. There is no one else around when you are getting close to your writing you might fall apart when no one is watching and when you are faced with stories of human rights violation, ones that remind you of your own experiences of bodily violation where someone invaded your private space, contaminated your integrity, and took away your sense of safety and freedom.…”
Section: Making Sense Of Autoethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%