2018
DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2018.1433959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Researching what matters to improve chronic pain care in Canada: A priority-setting partnership process to support patient-oriented research

Abstract: Background Chronic pain affects more than 6 million Canadians. Patients need to be involved in setting research priorities to ensure a focus on areas important to those who will be most impacted by the results. Aims The aim of this study was to leverage patient experiences to identify chronic pain research priorities in Canada. Method The process was informed by the James Lind Alliance. After gathering an exhaustive list of questions using su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address our specific goals, we adapted the priority setting methods described by the James Lind Alliance (JLA) [18]. Typically, JLA priority setting partnerships bring together patients and clinicians to identify unanswered research questions in a given clinical area; the list of finalized priorities is then released publicly with the goal of influencing funding agencies and researchers [4,19,20]. Priority setting methods include a widely distributed survey with open ended questions on a specific clinical area to generate ideas for research, response management which includes collating and removing duplicates, literature searches to determine if sufficient research has been conducted on responses, and an inperson workshop with approximately 20-25 respondents to identify the final priorities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address our specific goals, we adapted the priority setting methods described by the James Lind Alliance (JLA) [18]. Typically, JLA priority setting partnerships bring together patients and clinicians to identify unanswered research questions in a given clinical area; the list of finalized priorities is then released publicly with the goal of influencing funding agencies and researchers [4,19,20]. Priority setting methods include a widely distributed survey with open ended questions on a specific clinical area to generate ideas for research, response management which includes collating and removing duplicates, literature searches to determine if sufficient research has been conducted on responses, and an inperson workshop with approximately 20-25 respondents to identify the final priorities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Network aims to increase access to care for people living with pain and to speed translation of research into care. Patients are actively involved and participating as partners throughout the Network's governance, priority setting [4], research, and knowledge translation activities. Given this high level of patient engagement across the Network, there have been instances where patient partners have been recognized as authors on scientific publications from Networkfunded research projects [5] (personal communication with Dr. Dave Walton, March 5, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,39 Capturing experiences adequately and accurately is an important step in validating health and illness models, including chronic pain models in children and youth. 40,41 Woodgate and colleagues have provided support for the effectiveness of qualitative, arts-based methods in understanding health and illness experiences in young people by using drawing 36,42 and photovoice. 36,37,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49] The aim of this article is to highlight the ways in which pain is a central experience for young people living with an anxiety disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%