Resident Perceptions of Flagship Waterfront Regeneration: The Case of the Kop Van Zuid in Rotterdam

Abstract

Flagships, also referred to as megaprojects, and frequently involving waterfront regeneration, are a common form of urban redevelopment. Their goals are often aimed at an outside audience of tourists, investors and potential (high income) residents. While the target may be external, the ways in which these spaces are perceived by the local population is an important, and, as yet, under-researched, area. Many scholars suggest that flagships have a negative impact on cities, but their research stops short of asking local residents what they think themselves. This paper attempts to redress this imbalance in the literature by analysing a survey of residents' perceptions towards the Kop van Zuid in Rotterdam, a large waterfront regeneration project. The survey included residents in different neighbourhoods across the city to determine the roles played by spatial proximity, and socio-economic and demographic variables. Responses were more positive than expected, particularly among poorer residents in the vicinity of the flagship. We argue this has to do with the quality of life enhancements which the Kop van Zuid has brought. This can offer some insightful lessons when regenerating brownfield sites in the future.

Experiencing Dublin's Docklands: perceptions of employment and amenity changes in the Sheriff Street community

“…This is not totally surprising, as Bridge and Dowling (2001) conclude that retails spaces in gentrified areas represent the identities and consumption patterns of gentrifiers themselves. However, our findings in Dublin run counter to Doucet et al's (2011b) work on Rotterdam, which showed that low-income residents appreciated the amenities in Rotterdam's prestigious Kop van Zuid flagship waterfront project. This was due to the fact that Rotterdam's flagship had the type of stores and services such as affordable supermarkets and other 'basic' services which were being called for by Sheriff Street residents.…”

Power in the context of cruise destination stakeholders’ interrelationships

“…Following is a discussion of the circumstances which may both trigger and influence the exercise of power, based on the cruise infrastructure's stage of development. Cruise destinations can use or reuse urban land for marine activities (including for the development of cruise infrastructure) that has been deemed to be desirable, capable of attracting investors and potential residents as well as tourists (Doucet et al, 2010). Additionally, cruise terminals in particular are often perceived by local policy makers and planners as a means for strengthening a destination's competitiveness in a global environment where competition between cities becomes increasingly intense (McCarthy & Romein, 2012).…”

Gentrificación en España y América Latina: Un diálogo crítico

“…Estas políticas, desplegadas por las diferentes Administraciones Públicas, se pueden considerar como pauta habitual, como parte de una activa implementación de políticas neoliberales de gentrifi cación y como un medio para requerir la ciudad para los negocios, la clase media y las fuerzas del mercado en general (Peck, 2006: 681). Tales políticas públicas se ejemplifi can en los partenariados público-privados como los destinados a la regeneración de las zonas portuarias (Butler, 2007;Doucet et al, 2011a;2011b), la recuperación de antiguas zonas industriales (Díaz Orueta y Fainstein, 2009), o la renovación de los centros históricos para satisfacer las demandas de los consumidores de clase media y alta (Zukin, 1998). En todos estos casos, el Estado no solo organiza activamente la desposesión de los hogares de menores ingresos, sino que también implementa una poderosa estrategia discursiva para ocultar cualquier interpretación de su propia acción como parte de una agresiva ideología revanchista, diseñada para reconquistar el centro de la ciudad para las clases medias (Lees, 2008).…”