1955
DOI: 10.1086/221609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residential Distribution and Occupational Stratification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
154
0
24

Year Published

1963
1963
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 436 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
154
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known from the literature that particular indexes are often used (like the Index of Dissimilarity, the Index of Segregation, the Index of Isolation and the Exposure Index P*). These measures have been exhaustively described by many authors (see, for example, Bell, 1954;Duncan and Duncan, 1955;Taueber and Taueber, 1965;Peach, 1975;Lieberson, 1981;Farley, 1984) though also extensively criticised by others (see, for example, Woods, 1976). Despite the critique, most of the indexes are still in use, probably because of the relative ease with which they can be interpreted.…”
Section: Segregation and Concentration: De® Ning The Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known from the literature that particular indexes are often used (like the Index of Dissimilarity, the Index of Segregation, the Index of Isolation and the Exposure Index P*). These measures have been exhaustively described by many authors (see, for example, Bell, 1954;Duncan and Duncan, 1955;Taueber and Taueber, 1965;Peach, 1975;Lieberson, 1981;Farley, 1984) though also extensively criticised by others (see, for example, Woods, 1976). Despite the critique, most of the indexes are still in use, probably because of the relative ease with which they can be interpreted.…”
Section: Segregation and Concentration: De® Ning The Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1955, the differentiation Index D (Index of Dissimilarity) was widely used in the study of residential space differentiation, characterized by a strong representative, of which the role was to measure the differentiation intensity of a certain portion of residential land (Duncan and Duncan, 1955). Here, the value of D ranged between 0 and 1, of which 0 denotes no differentiation, while 1 denotes absolute differentiation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such measures already exist, developed in the ethnic segregation literature to gauge the extent to which ethnic minority households were concentrated near the city center (Duncan and Duncan 1955;Massey and Denton 1988). Curiously, there has been no recent work that we are aware of that applies centralization indexes to UK data on poverty and no consideration anywhere in the literature, as far as we are aware, to issues of statistical inference for estimates of change in decentralization indexes (see later).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measure was first proposed by Duncan and Duncan (1955) and is included in the widely read review by Massey and Denton (1988), which includes it as a measure of minority centralization, one of their five dimensions of segregation along with evenness, exposure, concentration, and clustering. Folch and Rey (2016) recently proposed the RCI as a local measure, applied to each and every aerial unit, to give a moving window of the locus of relative position of one group relative to another.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%