Residential experience of people with disabilities: A positive psychology perspective

Coulombe, Simon; Jutras, Sylvie; Labbé, Delphine; Jutras, Dominique

doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.03.002

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 85 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Voluminous number of studies focus on neighborhood satisfaction and they differ in terms of the individual characteristics of the participants or the neighborhood characteristics they focus on. Studies focus on parents (Cook, 1988;Gärling & Gärling, 1990), elders (Rioux & Werner, 2011) and disabled people (Coulombe et al, 2016). In terms of spatial characteristics, they focused on safety (Loo, 1986), place attachment (Bonaiuto, Aiello, Perugini, Bonnes, & Ercolani, 1999), upkeep and crime (Hur & Nasar, 2014).…”

Section: Neighborhood Definition and Neighborhood Satisfactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Covid-19 Pandemisinin Mahalle Algısı ve Memnuniyeti Üzerine Etkisi

ERİN

Cubukcu

2022

Kent Akademisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neighborhoods had a prominent role in cities and people's lives during the Covid-19 pandemic. Lockdowns, social distance, self-isolation, and stay-at-home orders have increased the time people spend in their homes and neighborhoods and changed their perception and behavior towards these areas. This study aimed to measure the change in perception of and satisfaction with the neighborhood before and during the pandemic. A neighborhood perception and satisfaction survey was conducted among residents of Karşıyaka/Izmir in February 2020 and August 2020. Results showed that the mean value of perceived neighborhood borders extended during the pandemic. In addition, 9 of 48 parameters of participants' neighborhood satisfaction evaluations were different before and during the pandemic. Some aspects of accessibility, physical environmental quality, and social relations were evaluated better after the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. In addition, residents revealed more tendency to move out of the neighborhood during the pandemic pointing to an expected increase in urban mobility. All these findings reflect the ambiguity and obscurity of the situation during the Covid-19 period from the perspective of the neighborhood residents. This study is significant because it provides empirical evidence on the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on neighborhood perception and satisfaction.

show abstract

Section: Neighborhood Definition and Neighborhood Satisfactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…From a methodological perspective, most of the neighborhood satisfaction studies relied on subjective measurements such as surveys (Coulombe et al, 2016;Hur & Nasar, 2014;Rioux & Werner, 2011;Gärling & Gärling, 1990;Hur & Morrow-Jones, 2008). Similarly, in this study neighborhood satisfaction was measured via a survey.…”

Section: Figure 3 Study Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

Covid-19 Pandemisinin Mahalle Algısı ve Memnuniyeti Üzerine Etkisi

ERİN

Cubukcu

2022

Kent Akademisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our results suggest that for many individuals, aspects of the family home, including features, distribution of space, and temporarily or long-term sharing with coresidential relatives, are simultaneously the background for and an aspect of dyadic coping in illness. When a family member is chronically ill, family functioning is challenged (Ryan et al, 2012) and the family's satisfaction with the home environment can be linked to the fact if family members participate or are considered in the home design (Coulombe et al, 2016). Developing or worsening illness might be accompanied by increasing importance of the home environment with decreasing impact of macro and meso environments.…”

Section: Theoretical Outlook On Dyadic Coping Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dyadic Coping: A Collection of Recent Studies

Bodenmann¹,

Falconier²,

Randall³

2019

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dyadic coping is a concept that has reached increased attention in psychological science within the last 20 years. Dyadic coping conceptualizes the way couples cope with stress together in sharing appraisals of demands, planning together how to deal with the stressors and engage in supportive or joint dyadic coping. Among the different theories of dyadic coping, the Systemic Transactional Model (STM;) has been applied to many studies on couples' coping with stress. While a recent meta-analysis shows that dyadiccoping is a robust and consistent predictor of relationship satisfaction and couple's functioning in community samples, some studies also reveal the significance of dyadic coping in dealing with psychological disorders (e.g., depression, anxiety) or severe illness (e.g., cancer, diabetes, COPD, etc.).Researchers all over the world build their research on this or other concepts of dyadic coping and many typically use the Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI) for assessing dyadic coping. So far, research on dyadic coping has been systematically presented in two books, one written by Revenson, Kayser, & Bodenmann in 2005, focussing on emerging perspectives on couples' coping, the other by Falconier, Randall, & Bodenmann more recently in 2016, addressing intercultural aspects of dyadic coping in African, American, Asian and European couples. This eBook gives an insight into recent dyadic coping research in different areas and countries.

show abstract

“…As a result of confusion, and possibly obfuscation, about this debunking, the scientific literature continues to include abundant numbers of papers referencing a tipping point around 3, despite the utter lack of evidence for any such claim. For example, Terni (2015) stated, “ Fredrickson (2009) found that a ratio of positive to negative emotions of 3 to 1 or more leads to flourishing, a finding that still holds despite recent criticism” (p. 12), while Coulombe, Jutras, Labbé, and Jutras (2016) appeared to imply that our only contribution had been to correct the possibility that, in cases with just a small amount of negative emotions, one’s positivity ratio might become invalid due to needing to divide by zero, but otherwise the critical positivity ratio still holds.…”

Section: Understanding Why Belief In the Critical Positivity Ratio Pementioning

confidence: 99%

Implications of Debunking the “Critical Positivity Ratio” for Humanistic Psychology: Introduction to Special Issue

Friedman

Brown

2018

Journal of Humanistic Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An extraordinary claim was made by one of the leading researchers within positive psychology, namely, there is a universal–invariant ratio between positive to negative emotions that serves as a unique tipping point between flourishing and languishing in individuals, marriages, organizations, and other human systems across all cultures and times. Known as the “critical positivity ratio,” this finding was supposedly derived from the famous Lorenz equation in physics by using the mathematics of nonlinear dynamic systems, and was defined precisely as “2.9013.” This exact number was widely touted as a great discovery by many leaders of positive psychology, had tremendous impact in various applied areas of psychology, and, more broadly, and was extensively cited in both the scientific literature and in the global popular media. However, this finding has been demonstrated to be bogus. Since its advent as a relatively new subdiscipline, positive psychology has claimed superiority to its precursor, the subdiscipline of humanistic psychology, in terms of supposedly both using more rigorous science and avoiding popularizing nonsense. The debunking of the critical positivity ratio demonstrates that positive psychology did not live up to these claims, and this has important implications, which are discussed in terms of “romantic scientism” and “voodoo science.” In addition, articles in the special issue on the “Implications of Debunking the ‘Critical Positivity Ratio’ for Humanistic Psychology” are introduced, as they also delve into these concerns.

show abstract

Residential experience of people with disabilities: A positive psychology perspective

Cited by 8 publications

References 85 publications

Covid-19 Pandemisinin Mahalle Algısı ve Memnuniyeti Üzerine Etkisi

Covid-19 Pandemisinin Mahalle Algısı ve Memnuniyeti Üzerine Etkisi

Dyadic Coping: A Collection of Recent Studies

Implications of Debunking the “Critical Positivity Ratio” for Humanistic Psychology: Introduction to Special Issue

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About